Inverse factorials. What are they? How to calculate?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ktoz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorials Inverse
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of inverse factorials, specifically how to calculate them and their relationship to the gamma function. It is established that inverse factorials do not have a simple formula and are undefined for certain values, such as 3. The online calculator provided yields a complex expression for the inverse factorial, indicating that a numerical inverse or closed form does not exist. The conversation also highlights the use of the Lambert W function in approximating the inverse of the factorial function for positive integers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of factorial functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the gamma function and its significance in mathematics
  • Knowledge of the Lambert W function and its applications
  • Basic proficiency in using mathematical software like Mathematica
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of the gamma function in advanced mathematics
  • Learn about the Lambert W function and its role in solving equations involving exponentials
  • Explore numerical methods for approximating inverse functions in mathematical software
  • Investigate graphical representations of complex functions using Mathematica or similar tools
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying advanced calculus, software developers working with mathematical algorithms, and anyone interested in the theoretical aspects of factorials and their inverses.

ktoz
Messages
170
Reaction score
12
Hi

I was trying to solve the equation (m + n)!/m! = v for "n" and found an online calculator http://www.hostsrv.com/webmab/app1/MSP/quickmath/02/pageGenerate?site=quickmath&s1=equations&s2=solve&s3=advanced#reply" which spit out the following as a solution:

n = factorial(-1)[vm!] - m

I Googled "inverse factorial" and searched on wolfram.com and wikipedia.com but didn't find a clear answer as to what inverse factorials are, much less how to calculate them.

Factorials are so simple to calculate (1 x 2 x 3 ... x n) do inverse factorials have a similarly simple method?

Thanks for any help
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
"Inverse factorial" is, of course, the inverse of the factorial functions: Since 1!= 1, factorial-1(1)= 1, 2!= 2 so factorial-1(2)= 2. 3!= 6 so factorial-1(6)= 3, etc. You will notice that there is no number n such that n!= 3, say, so factorial-1(3) is undefined. No, there is no simple formula- that's why the online calculator gave you the function in that form.

(0!= 1 also so the factorial has to be restricted to positive integers in order to have an inverse.)
 
presumably in general it would be the inverse of the gamma function.
 
Mathematica gives a warning
Code:
During evaluation of InverseFunction::ifun: Inverse function
are being used. Values may be lost for multivalued inverses. >>
and then proceeds to print Factorial^(-1)(n)

As it gives the same output when replacing Factorial by any (undefined) function f, I don't think there it knows a numerical inverse (let alone a closed form exists) and f^(-1) is just what it (or the online calculator) give in general when they don't know the inverse of a function.

Neither does it know an inverse of the \Gamma function, which doesn't really surprise me.
 
The gamma inverse function is multivalued for a given number. So there are many different branches .
If you have mathematica you might plot the following code that i made to visualize this function:

G[u_] := 1/Gamma;

Manipulate[Quiet[ParametricPlot3D[{
Re[f[x + \[ImaginaryI] y]], Im[f[x + \[ImaginaryI] y]],
variabletype}, {x, xo, xf}, {y, yo, yf},
PlotStyle -> Opacity[.85], ColorFunction -> (Hue[#5/(2 Pi)] &),
ColorFunctionScaling -> False,
RegionFunction ->
Function[{x, y, z},
If[condition, 0 < Im[f[x + I*y]], 0 > Im[f[x + I*y]],
Im[f[x + I*y]] > -10^6]], BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 3}]]
, {{variabletype, x, ""}, {x -> "Real Part", y -> "Imaginary Part"}}
, {{f, Gamma, "Riemann surface of the inverse"}, { Gamma -> "gamma",
G -> "1/Gamma[z]"}}, {{xo, -6, "initial value of x"}, -6,
0}, {{xf, 4, "final value of x"}, 0,
6}, {{yo, -Pi, "initial value of y"}, -2 Pi,
0}, {{yf, Pi, "final value of y"}, 0,
2 Pi}, {{condition, "Show All",
"Complex Plane View"}, {True -> "Upper Part",
False -> "Lower Part", "Show all"}}]
It will give you a the continuation of gamma-1 function over the complex z plane.
It is possible to find the many different values of this function graphicaly.
On the attachement, you will see the 2 first plots are the real part , and the lasts are the imaginary part.
 

Attachments

  • Gammainverse.jpg
    Gammainverse.jpg
    32.3 KB · Views: 1,572
The factorial does not have an inverse, since 0!=1!=1.
The gamma function also does not have an inverse.

However, by restricting the range of the factorial function (as is done for the standard trigonometric functions, sin, cos, etc.), we can define the inverse of the principal branch of the factorial function (i.e n! where n>=1). [For the gamma function with a zero imaginary value, this can also be done.]

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=4146" posted in
http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=342551&tstart=0

Letting L(x) = ln((x+c)/Sqrt(2*pi)), the inverse of my gamma
approximation is

ApproxInvGamma or AIG(x) = L(x) / W(L(x) / e) + 1/2.

A precise inverse for the factorial function N! for positive integer N can
now be given by simply rounding to the nearest integer (since errors are
sufficiently small -- less than 1/2 being all that was required):

InvFact(x) = Round(AIG(x)) - 1 for x = N!


The equation uses the principal branch of the Lambert W function [the inverse function of f(x) = x*exp(x)].
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
13K
Replies
3
Views
2K