Inverse Fourier Transform of $\frac{b}{\pi(x^2+b^2)}$: Solving the Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverse Fourier transform of the function \(\frac{b}{\pi(x^2+b^2)}\). Participants are exploring the mathematical techniques involved in this process, particularly in relation to complex integration and contour integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to derive the inverse Fourier transform without prior knowledge of the existing pair. They express uncertainty about the necessity of complex integration. Other participants suggest the use of contour integrals and discuss closing the contour with a semicircle.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their thoughts on the use of contour integration. The original poster acknowledges their initial thoughts and seeks clarification on the methods available, indicating a productive exchange of ideas without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention that the textbook being referenced does not cover complex integration, which may influence the approaches considered by the participants.

buttersrocks
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to take the inverse Fourier transform of

\frac{b}{\pi(x^2+b^2)}

Homework Equations



f(t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{itx}\frac{b}{\pi(x^2+b^2)}dx

It might be useful that \frac{2b}{\pi(x^2+b^2)}=\frac{1}{b+ix}+\frac{1}{b-ix}

The Attempt at a Solution


I know the result is e^{(-b|t|)}, and I can get from e^{(-b|t|)} to
\frac{b}{\pi(x^2+b^2)}, but how do I do it in reverse if I didn't already know the pair existed? This doesn't require complex integration does it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have to admit my first thought was a contour integral...

In my experience, things involving |x| tend to require them.
 
It is a standard contour integral. Close the contour with a semicircle above the real axis.
 
Okay guys, thanks, that is what I was thinking, but the book I'm in doesn't have anything else involving complex integration, so I assumed that I was just missing a trick.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K