I Investigating the 1d Equation: Charges & Field Disparity

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Noki Lee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    1d Charges Field
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of the 1D equation (dE/dx = λ/ε0) to analyze electric fields between charge densities. It highlights a misunderstanding regarding the behavior of the electric field, which points in opposite directions on either side of the charges, leading to a zero field between them. The necessity of incorporating a constant of integration based on boundary conditions is emphasized for accurate graph representation. The conversation clarifies that the initial intuition about the field's behavior was incorrect. Ultimately, the participants reach an understanding of how to correctly apply the equation and adjust the graph accordingly.
Noki Lee
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Can we apply the 1d equation (dE/dx = labmda/epsilon0)dEdx=λϵ0 to the first and the second figures?
1.PNG

But, in the 2nd case,
2.png


if we integrate the charge density, some field exists between the two charge densities. Intuitively, it should be like the last figure.
What's wrong with this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your intuition is wrong. The E-field on the left and right point in opposite directions. This is what you get in your case (1) if you add a (negative) constant of integration so E is zero between the two charges.
 
phyzguy said:
Your intuition is wrong. The E-field on the left and right point in opposite directions. This is what you get in your case (1) if you add a (negative) constant of integration so E is zero between the two charges.
3.png

I mistook the intuition, did you mean this figure?

But why we can't apply the above 1D equation?
 
Yes, I mean that figure. You can use the above 1D equation, but when you do the integration, you always have a constant of integration that you have to determine from the boundary conditions. So your graph (1) needs to have a negative constant added to it so it looks like the graph (2) in post #3. Do you understand?
 
phyzguy said:
Yes, I mean that figure. You can use the above 1D equation, but when you do the integration, you always have a constant of integration that you have to determine from the boundary conditions. So your graph (1) needs to have a negative constant added to it so it looks like the graph (2) in post #3. Do you understand?
I got it, thank you.
 
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top