MHB Is 1, α, α², ..., αⁿ⁻¹ a Basis for ℚ(α)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter said
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether the set {1, α, α², ..., αⁿ⁻¹} forms a basis for the rational vector space ℚ(α), where α is a complex number. Participants emphasize that while this set spans ℚ(α), it does not automatically qualify as a basis without demonstrating linear independence. A polynomial P(t) of degree n with P(α) = 0 is relevant for establishing linear independence, as it implies that the linear combination of the basis elements can equal zero only if all coefficients are zero. There is a clarification that a subset of a spanning set is not necessarily a basis, and further discussion is needed to address the proof of linear independence. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly understanding the definitions and properties of vector spaces and their bases.
said
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Let α ∈ ℂ be a complex number. Let V = ℚ(α) be the rational vector space spanned by powers of α. That is
ℚ(α) = <1,α,α2,...>.
1) If P(t) is a polynomial of degree n such that P(α) = 0, show that dimℚ(α) is at most n.
Here is my attempt to solve this question. Please give me some feedback/corrections.

Since ℚ(α) = <1,α,α2,...> we know that 1,α,α2,... span ℚ(α).
To show that dimℚ(α) is at most n, we must show that 1,α,α2,..,αn-1 is a basis of ℚ(α).
To show it is a basis,
i) 1,α,α2,..,αn-1 must span ℚ(α)
ii) 1,α,α2,..,αn-1 must be linearly independent.For span:I would say that since 1,α,... spans ℚ(α) then 1,α,...,αn-1 spans ℚ(α) because its elements are in the set 1,α,...

For linear independence: I was thinking of using induction but I'm not sure how I should go about it.

As for P(α) = 0 I am not quite sure what relevance it has. It tells us that
P(α) = a0 + a1α + a2α2 + . . . + an-1αn-1 = 0
Perhaps it helps showing linear independence since we want 1,α,...,αn-1 to be written as
a0 + a1α + a2α2 + . . . + an-1αn-1 = 0 where a0 = a1 = . . . = an-1 = 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
smoha020 said:
Let α ∈ ℂ be a complex number. Let V = ℚ(α) be the rational vector space spanned by powers of α. That is
ℚ(α) = <1,α,α2,...>.
1) If P(t) is a polynomial of degree n such that P(α) = 0, show that dimℚ(α) is at most n.
Here is my attempt to solve this question. Please give me some feedback/corrections.

Since ℚ(α) = <1,α,α2,...> we know that 1,α,α2,... span ℚ(α).
To show that dimℚ(α) is at most n, we must show that 1,α,α2,..,αn-1 is a basis of ℚ(α). Mistake here.
To show it is a basis,
i) 1,α,α2,..,αn-1 must span ℚ(α)
ii) 1,α,α2,..,αn-1 must be linearly independent.For span:I would say that since 1,α,... spans ℚ(α) then 1,α,...,αn-1 spans ℚ(α) because its elements are in the set 1,α,... This reasoning is not correct.[/color]

For linear independence: I was thinking of using induction but I'm not sure how I should go about it.

As for P(α) = 0 I am not quite sure what relevance it has. It tells us that
P(α) = a0 + a1α + a2α2 + . . . + an-1αn-1 = 0
Perhaps it helps showing linear independence since we want 1,α,...,αn-1 to be written as
a0 + a1α + a2α2 + . . . + an-1αn-1 = 0 where a0 = a1 = . . . = an-1 = 0

Hello smoha. Welcome to MHB.

It is strange that you questioned had not been answered earlier. Probably because you hadn't used LaTeX. Check out the LaTeX forum of our site. It doesn't take much time to get started.

Now.

As for the first mistake, note that a spanning set for a vector space is not necessarily a basis.

The second one is a bit more serious. What you have essentially argued is that a subset of a spanning set of a vector space is a basis.
This is clearly not true.

I can walk you through the proof once you understand these mistakes.
 
I simply do not see the mistakes that you pointed out.

As for the first one, I don't see where I implied that a spanning set of a vector space is a basis.

For the second one, I only said that we must show that this subspace is a basis. I did not say it is a basis.
 
smoha020 said:
I simply do not see the mistakes that you pointed out.

As for the first one, I don't see where I implied that a spanning set of a vector space is a basis.

For the second one, I only said that we must show that this subspace is a basis. I did not say it is a basis.

The line where I pointed out the first mistake reads:

To show that $\dim_{\mathbb Q}\mathbb Q(\alpha)$ is atmost $n$, we need to show that $1, \alpha, \ldots, \alpha^{n-1}$ is basis.

The reason why I called this a mistake is that: To show that $\dim_{\mathbb Q}\mathbb Q(\alpha)$ is atmost $n$, we only need to show that $1, \alpha, \ldots, \alpha^{n-1}$ spans $\mathbb Q(\alpha)$.

May be calling this a mistake was a bit extreme. Forgive me for that.

Now for the second mistake.

You argue that since $1, \alpha, \alpha^2,\ldots$ spans $\mathbb Q(\alpha)$, so does $1,\alpha,\alpha^2,\ldots, \alpha^{n-1}$.

This to me sounds like: Since $S\subseteq V$ spans a vector space $V$, therefore $T\subseteq S$ also spans $V$.

Can you please elaborate on your reasoning so that I can understand your question better.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K