Is 2009 Really the Year of Astronomy?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mjsd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astronomy Year
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the significance of the year 2009 being designated as the International Year of Astronomy. Participants explore the reasons behind this designation, its implications for public engagement in astronomy, and the historical context related to key figures like Galileo and Kepler.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the significance of 2009 as the Year of Astronomy, questioning whether it is merely a public relations initiative or if there are substantive scientific events planned.
  • One participant suggests that the year provides an opportunity to discuss foundational concepts in astronomy, such as the Hubble redshift-distance relation, and reflects on historical perspectives regarding Hubble's views on redshift and expansion.
  • Another participant notes that 2009 commemorates the 400th anniversary of Galileo's first telescopic observations and Kepler's publication of "Astronomia nova," which are key historical milestones in astronomy.
  • Links to upcoming events related to the International Year of Astronomy are shared by participants, indicating an interest in public outreach and educational opportunities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the historical significance of 2009 in relation to Galileo and Kepler, but there are varying opinions on the broader implications of the designation as the Year of Astronomy and whether it represents a significant scientific initiative or a promotional effort.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions touch on the historical context of Hubble's work and its interpretation, indicating a complexity in the understanding of redshift and its implications for cosmology that remains unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to educators, students of astronomy, and those involved in public outreach in science, particularly in relation to historical developments in the field.

mjsd
Homework Helper
Messages
725
Reaction score
3
I heard that this year is the Year of Astronomy. Being a "physicist" at the university, a local science teacher invited me to help out with writing some talks/presentations for the students at their high school on the topics of astrophysics...

So, why 2009? What is so special? What is going to happen? Just a public relation thing or the scientific community have something special install? What are the views of the researchers in the Astronomy sector on this?

comments welcomed :smile:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It might be a good opportunity to touch on some basics, like the Hubble redshift-distance relation, and put that in some historical perspective. As a very prominent observational astronomer wrote me in 1988 after attending the "Cosmology in Retrospect" symposium (and having reviewed Hubble's papers) "Hubble always said 'if the redshift means velocity', and even in a paper published in 1953 after his death, he said 'c x z = velocity is not formally correct.' " The proponents of the Big Bang (Gamow et al) seized on Hubble's work to "prove" expansion, though Hubble was reluctant to endorse that. He was a cautious and conservative observer.
 
mjsd said:
So, why 2009? What is so special?

Formally, 2009 being chosen as the international year of astronomy is because it commemorates both the 400th anniversary of Galileo's first telescopic observations and Kepler's publication of Astronomia nova.
 
thanks for the comments.



Nabeshin said:
Formally, 2009 being chosen as the international year of astronomy is because it commemorates both the 400th anniversary of Galileo's first telescopic observations and Kepler's publication of Astronomia nova.

oh, is that why eh? ok... :smile:

either way, should be a good opportunity for me to learn more about astro/cosmology...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K