Is 8 Your Lucky Number and What Does It Mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the significance of various favorite numbers among participants, highlighting their mathematical beauty and personal connections. Numbers such as 8, 2, and 0 are frequently mentioned for their aesthetic appeal and utility in mathematics. The conversation also touches on concepts like factorials, the imaginary unit i, and the fundamental theorem of algebra, emphasizing their importance in mathematical theory. Participants share anecdotes about how certain numbers have influenced their lives and learning experiences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic mathematical concepts such as factorials and prime numbers.
  • Familiarity with the fundamental theorem of algebra.
  • Knowledge of the imaginary unit i and its significance in complex numbers.
  • Awareness of mathematical constants like e and π.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties and applications of factorials in combinatorics.
  • Study the implications of the fundamental theorem of algebra in polynomial equations.
  • Learn about the significance of the imaginary unit i in complex analysis.
  • Investigate the mathematical beauty and applications of constants like e and π.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students, and anyone interested in the philosophical and practical significance of numbers in mathematics.

  • #31
1729 before anyone else claims it!

This is the number (least one that is sum of two cubes writeable in more than one way) in the famous Hardy anecdote about Ramanujan.

I did actually see about 10 years ago a London taxi with registration plate TXI1729.

I bet not a lot of people here have done that. So lifetime acheivement! :approve:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
拾叁
 
  • #33
17. There is an old mathematics adage: If you can prove it for x = 17, then it has a good chance to be true for all x.
 
  • #34
Pi. It's probably the most or the second most famous irrational number. And it distinctly smells of baked apples and cinnamon.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jackwhirl
  • #35
7.
The smallest of the more 'interesting' primes.
e.g. when I was learning how to express x/y as a decimal, it was 1/7, 2/7, 3/7 etc that made me realize decimals weren't just an uninteresting variation on fractions.
i.e. 0.142857... , 0.285714... , 0.428571... etc
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kith
  • #36
Both 0 and 1 are mentioned as favorite numbers here. It's apparently assumed that by "number" we mostly mean the natural numbers or the non-negative integers. The latter includes 0. However 0 and 1 are neither prime numbers nor composite numbers. They are specifically excluded in the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic. Zero and one are algebraic identities. Zero is the additive identity and one is the multiplicative identity. The latter is the reason why 1 can't be prime. It is a "factor" of every natural number. To properly define "prime number" we must exclude 1.

It seems even mathematicians don't know exactly what to do with 0 and 1 in terms of classification. It all seems a bit awkward.
 
Last edited:
  • #37
33550336, It was the result of one of my first computer programs!
It convinced me that a connection must exist between perfect numbers and Mersenne primes. You can read all about it on wikipedia now, but it was more difficult to find such information in a small farming village in 1994.
 
  • #38
I like pi
And e is cool
Favorite is i
 
  • #39
My favourite number... What a curious question.
It is "-1". Why such a -1 be interesting.?
Well, we could set -1 as a very beautiful combination of number e, number i and number phi.
Then, e(i*π) = -1 !
 
  • #40
8. Oh, I guess you eight one two
 
  • #41
Wastrophysicist said:
Then, e(i*π) = -1 !

I don't why people like this expression so much, because it has the minus sign in it? I think the most poetic form of Euler's identity is "e^i2π=1" This is a very clean expression, no fussy minus signs, and brings it all around full circle :oldsmile:
 
  • #42
DiracPool said:
I don't why people like this expression so much, because it has the minus sign in it? I think the most poetic form of Euler's identity is "e^i2π=1" This is a very clean expression, no fussy minus signs, and brings it all around full circle :oldsmile:
Indeed, my e(i*π) = -1 is not the better. Maybe it will be e(i*π) + 1 = 0 since it has number e, i , π, 1 and 0. I wrote e(i*π) = -1 because it simplifies the expression and gives a "-1" which is a number that is not as much as popular as 0. I just wanted to remark that -1 could be a weird and beautiful expresion. I don't know if "e^i2π=1" will be as much as beautiful, since there is a "2" in it, and it is not as important nor beautiful as e, i , π, 1 or 0 (despite that 2 has its own rare properties, like to be the only prime number that is even).
 
  • #43
Wastrophysicist said:
I don't know if "e^i2π=1" will be as much as beautiful, since there is a "2" in it, and it is not as important nor beautiful as e, i , π, 1 or 0

I love your passion here, but I still think that my expression is the most beautiful. The fact is that we are stuck with PI and I don't see that changing in the foreseeable future. But a more elegant form of the Euler identity would be to use the Tau term which would eliminate the "2" that you seem to have a problem with. So, it would be e^iτ=1.

 
  • #44
DiracPool said:
8. Oh, I guess you eight one two

ROTFLMAO :biggrin: Well done DP.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
634
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
11K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K