Is 8 Your Lucky Number and What Does It Mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around participants sharing their favorite numbers and the reasons behind their choices. Zero is highlighted for its utility in mathematics, while the number e is appreciated for its significance in differential equations. Aesthetically pleasing numbers like 8 and 42 are mentioned, with 8 noted for its visual symmetry and connection to infinity. The number 2 is discussed for its foundational role in mathematics, and 4-O-9 is recognized for its connection to fractals. Participants also touch on the beauty of the imaginary unit i and its implications in complex analysis. The conversation includes references to personal experiences with certain numbers, such as 39 and 711, and explores the mathematical properties of numbers and their cultural significance. Overall, the thread showcases a blend of mathematical appreciation and personal anecdotes related to favorite numbers.
  • #31
1729 before anyone else claims it!

This is the number (least one that is sum of two cubes writeable in more than one way) in the famous Hardy anecdote about Ramanujan.

I did actually see about 10 years ago a London taxi with registration plate TXI1729.

I bet not a lot of people here have done that. So lifetime acheivement! :approve:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
拾叁
 
  • #33
17. There is an old mathematics adage: If you can prove it for x = 17, then it has a good chance to be true for all x.
 
  • #34
Pi. It's probably the most or the second most famous irrational number. And it distinctly smells of baked apples and cinnamon.
 
  • Like
Likes jackwhirl
  • #35
7.
The smallest of the more 'interesting' primes.
e.g. when I was learning how to express x/y as a decimal, it was 1/7, 2/7, 3/7 etc that made me realize decimals weren't just an uninteresting variation on fractions.
i.e. 0.142857... , 0.285714... , 0.428571... etc
 
  • Like
Likes kith
  • #36
Both 0 and 1 are mentioned as favorite numbers here. It's apparently assumed that by "number" we mostly mean the natural numbers or the non-negative integers. The latter includes 0. However 0 and 1 are neither prime numbers nor composite numbers. They are specifically excluded in the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic. Zero and one are algebraic identities. Zero is the additive identity and one is the multiplicative identity. The latter is the reason why 1 can't be prime. It is a "factor" of every natural number. To properly define "prime number" we must exclude 1.

It seems even mathematicians don't know exactly what to do with 0 and 1 in terms of classification. It all seems a bit awkward.
 
Last edited:
  • #37
33550336, It was the result of one of my first computer programs!
It convinced me that a connection must exist between perfect numbers and Mersenne primes. You can read all about it on wikipedia now, but it was more difficult to find such information in a small farming village in 1994.
 
  • #38
I like pi
And e is cool
Favorite is i
 
  • #39
My favourite number... What a curious question.
It is "-1". Why such a -1 be interesting.?
Well, we could set -1 as a very beautiful combination of number e, number i and number phi.
Then, e(i*π) = -1 !
 
  • #40
8. Oh, I guess you eight one two
 
  • #41
Wastrophysicist said:
Then, e(i*π) = -1 !

I don't why people like this expression so much, because it has the minus sign in it? I think the most poetic form of Euler's identity is "e^i2π=1" This is a very clean expression, no fussy minus signs, and brings it all around full circle :oldsmile:
 
  • #42
DiracPool said:
I don't why people like this expression so much, because it has the minus sign in it? I think the most poetic form of Euler's identity is "e^i2π=1" This is a very clean expression, no fussy minus signs, and brings it all around full circle :oldsmile:
Indeed, my e(i*π) = -1 is not the better. Maybe it will be e(i*π) + 1 = 0 since it has number e, i , π, 1 and 0. I wrote e(i*π) = -1 because it simplifies the expression and gives a "-1" which is a number that is not as much as popular as 0. I just wanted to remark that -1 could be a weird and beautiful expresion. I don't know if "e^i2π=1" will be as much as beautiful, since there is a "2" in it, and it is not as important nor beautiful as e, i , π, 1 or 0 (despite that 2 has its own rare properties, like to be the only prime number that is even).
 
  • #43
Wastrophysicist said:
I don't know if "e^i2π=1" will be as much as beautiful, since there is a "2" in it, and it is not as important nor beautiful as e, i , π, 1 or 0

I love your passion here, but I still think that my expression is the most beautiful. The fact is that we are stuck with PI and I don't see that changing in the foreseeable future. But a more elegant form of the Euler identity would be to use the Tau term which would eliminate the "2" that you seem to have a problem with. So, it would be e^iτ=1.

 
  • #44
DiracPool said:
8. Oh, I guess you eight one two

ROTFLMAO :biggrin: Well done DP.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
343
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K