Is a+b necessarily irrational?

  • Thread starter Thread starter r0bHadz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irrational
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical question of whether the sum of a rational number (a) and an irrational number (b) is necessarily irrational. The consensus is that a + b is indeed irrational; if it were rational, then b would also be rational, which contradicts its definition. Additionally, when both a and b are irrational, their sum can be rational, as demonstrated by the example where b equals r - a for some rational number r. This highlights the complexity of irrational numbers and their interactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rational and irrational numbers
  • Basic algebraic manipulation
  • Familiarity with mathematical notation
  • Knowledge of number theory concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of rational and irrational numbers in depth
  • Explore examples of sums of irrational numbers that yield rational results
  • Learn about number theory and its implications on rationality
  • Investigate mathematical proofs related to irrational numbers
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, educators teaching number theory, and anyone interested in the properties of rational and irrational numbers.

r0bHadz
Messages
194
Reaction score
17

Homework Statement


If a is rational and b is irrational, is a+b necessarily irrational?

What if a and b are both irrational?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The books answer:

1)Yes, for if a+b were rational, then b = (a+b) - a would be rational.
This makes sense for me, but I looked at it a little differently:

If we have a number that never terminates after the decimal, and a number that does, or it keeps on repeating, then if we add those two the result will be a number that does not terminate.

2) If a and b are irrational, then a+b could be rational, for b could be r-a for some rational number a

This one confuses me. How can you say a is irrational, then go on to say that a is rational?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nvm I understand now, though his notation is pretty weird. Not sure why you would choose to use the same letter but whateva
 
r0bHadz said:
2) If a and b are irrational, then a+b could be rational, for b could be r-a for some rational number a

r0bHadz said:
Nvm I understand now, though his notation is pretty weird. Not sure why you would choose to use the same letter
I'm certain it's a typo. The first sentence above should say "for b could be r - a for some rational number r."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K