Is a Black Hole One-Sided or a Spherical Entity?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fakts
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Black hole Hole
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of black holes, specifically whether they are one-sided or spherical entities. Participants explore the implications of black hole geometry on how they interact with surrounding matter, including the formation of accretion disks and the visual representations often seen in media.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether black holes suck matter from one side or all sides, prompting a discussion on their shape.
  • Some participants assert that black holes are spherical and attract objects from any orientation.
  • Another participant notes that media representations often depict swirling disks around black holes, which raises questions about the accuracy of these portrayals.
  • It is suggested that the appearance of disks may be due to the arrangement of matter in orbit around the black hole, rather than a characteristic of the black hole itself.
  • A participant explains that non-rotating black holes are spherically symmetric, while rotating black holes exhibit cylindrical symmetry, leading to the formation of accretion disks.
  • There is a discussion about how matter tends to arrange itself in disks due to orbital dynamics, which affects how it is drawn into a black hole.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of frame dragging and its potential effects on the orientation of the accretion disk.
  • Some participants express confusion about the shape of black holes, with one suggesting that they might be conical due to event horizons, while others clarify that they are mathematically described as point masses surrounded by spherical event horizons.
  • A participant reflects on the broader implications of black holes, including their role in galaxies and their ability to bend light.
  • There is a mention of a book about black holes, prompting a question about the consequences of encountering one.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the shape and behavior of black holes, with no clear consensus reached. Some agree on the spherical nature of black holes, while others question how this relates to the observed disk formations and dynamics of matter around them.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about black hole behavior, such as the effects of rotation and the arrangement of surrounding matter, which are not fully resolved. The complexity of black hole physics and the limitations of visual representations in media are acknowledged but not conclusively addressed.

fakts
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I hear them always saying "black hole", my question is:
Is it a black hole that sucks stuff from one side, or is it like a black ball (sphere) that sucks thingies from all sides?

If asked or explained else where on the forum please refer me and I will delete this one
Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
They are indeed spheres which attract objects from any orientation.
 
Then why whenever there is a doc about it on TV they show something like a swirling disk and things are going in circle around the hole (lol) then being sucked?!
 
It may just be artistic license or it may be a reflection of the fact that clouds of matter often take up disk shapes, making things look two dimensional (for example, spiral galaxies and our solar system are both arranged in disks).
 
Hmm.. I know what you mean
But I'm having difficulties believing that matter will get sucked in a disk shape since the earlier guy replied saying it is a ball (Sphere) and not a hole.
So if it is a ball like thing then that means things should be sucked in a straight line from all directions, and not disks and things going in circle.
I'm I wrong?
 
A non-rotating black hole is indeed spherically symmetric. But most real world black holes are rotating, usually rotating rapidly. So they are not spherically symmetric, they are cylindrically symmetric about the axis of rotation. The rapid rotation of the black hole distorts space around the black hole, and this is what causes there to be a disk (called the accretion disk) around the equator. Simulations show that infalling matter gets pulled into this disk, and some of the matter falls into the black hole, while some of it gets shot out along the poles, resulting in the jets you've probably seen. Exactly how the material gets shot into the jets is still being studied, but it is believed that magnetic fields in the ionized plasma of the accretion disk play a role.
 
Well explained
Thanks
 
The rapid rotation of the black hole distorts space around the black hole, and this is what causes there to be a disk (called the accretion disk) around the equator.
That's not quite right. An accretion disk will be around any gravitating object, rotating or not, if there is infalling matter with some tangential motion.
They are alway showing the accretion disk as the Black Hole is not very photogenic, black against a dark background.
 
fakts said:
But I'm having difficulties believing that matter will get sucked in a disk shape since the earlier guy replied saying it is a ball (Sphere) and not a hole.
So if it is a ball like thing then that means things should be sucked in a straight line from all directions, and not disks and things going in circle.
I'm I wrong?
To expand on/take a different tack from what Ich explained, a black hole can only suck in matter that is around/near it, so if the matter around/near it is arranged spherically from it, it will suck it in from all directions, but if the matter is arranged in a disk, it will suck it in from two dimensions.

So why might matter be arranged in a disk instead of a sphere? As the examples I gave show, matter tends to be arranged in disks because matter is in orbit around other matter. An orbit is planar/disk-like. So the most obvious case (and also one of the most common for a black hole) is where a black hole is sucking matter away from a nearby companion object. Since the object is in orbit around the black hole, it is creating a disk shape and matter being sucked away remains in that disk because it is the most direct path to the black hole. Here's an artist's rendering of what I'm describing:
http://www.cosmographica.com/gallery/portfolio2007/content/bin/images/large/131_BlackHole.jpg
 
  • #10
Yes, well, there may be as many as two distinguishable effects that contribute to the disk, then its reorientation. The first is due to collisions of matter in a plane perpendicular to the average momentum of the surrounding matter. The second force is due to frame drag, where the angular momenum of the object 'drags' spacetime with it and may reorentate the outboard disk.
 
  • #11
That's a toughy. I've heard that "black holes" have event horizons. Which makes it sound like they are almost conical in shape. A sphere would also make sense. Although, "black holes" are supposed to condense everything to a single point. So why can't they just be a single point to begin with.

I recently read somewhere that "black holes" spew neutrinos. If there was a way to measure how many it could decipher which shape it is. If the neutrinos are coming in mass in one direction, then a cone like shape would be adequate. If there are neutrinos being spewed out in all directions, then a sphere would make sense.
 
  • #12
So why can't they just be a single point to begin with.
They are, in their mathematical description. There's a "point mass", and around it a spherical event horizon. Most frequently, you'll find the latter be identified with the "black hole" in the popular literature. So you'd say a black hole is a sphere.
 
  • #13
nice dialog here. i have been obsessing about climate for 6-7 years now, and believe it or not, it always seems to get entangled with the cosmos. i have ended up thinking about black holes a lot as a result. a black hole(i still wish it was call just dark space or something because hole does not suit it IMO) gives us many clues of itself, the most important is its galaxy. also they seem to exist in a galaxy's center. I am not 100% but i think they all seem to spin in the same direction. they seems to be able to merge with one and other, or at the minimum share a level of attraction to each other. but most important a black hole can bend the path of light... amazing...
jeeze its 3:30 am I am going to bed.
not many things as interesting, and still open to discussion. as a super massive black hole
 
  • #14
I just bought the book, "Death by Black Hole" by Neil DeGrasse Tyson. It should be interesting.

Do you think that you would die if you came into contact with a black hole? How would anyone really know?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K