MHB Is a fractal always a predictable pattern?

  • Thread starter Thread starter OMGMathPLS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fractal
AI Thread Summary
Fractals are structures that exhibit self-similarity at any scale, but they can also be non-deterministic and complex, as seen in coastlines and CGI landscapes. The Mandelbrot fractal, for example, reveals increasingly intricate patterns upon zooming in, yet maintains a core of symmetry without repeating exactly. While fractals are defined by their self-similarity, they can still display rich and varied features. The discussion highlights that a fractal's Hausdorff dimension can exceed its topological dimension, emphasizing its complexity. Ultimately, fractals can be both predictable in their self-similarity and unpredictable in their detailed structures.
OMGMathPLS
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
It never goes crazy and starts doing it's own unpredictable number pattern or sequence, right? Thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
OMGMathPLS said:
It never goes crazy and starts doing it's own unpredictable number pattern or sequence, right? Thanks in advance.

Coastlines are often considered fractal, in fact they are one of the earliest known structures to be considered fractal and they are not deterministic. Same with fractal landscaped used in CGI (pseudo-non-deterministic).

.
 
zzephod said:
Coastlines are often considered fractal, in fact they are one of the earliest known structures to be considered fractal and they are not deterministic. Same with fractal landscaped used in CGI (pseudo-non-deterministic).

.

Can a fractal be irrational and non repeating?
 
OMGMathPLS said:
Can a fractal be irrational and non repeating?

Strictly speaking a fractal is any structure which exhibits self-similarly at any scale. So in some sense it kind of has to have a periodic component. But it can still be quite rich in features. For instance, take a look at the Mandelbrot fractal, if you zoom in on it at various levels of detail you tend to see more and more elaborate patterns, but ultimately they are just the same few types of symmetry repeated over and over again in slightly different ways.
 
Bacterius said:
For instance, take a look at the Mandelbrot fractal, if you zoom in on it at various levels of detail you tend to see more and more elaborate patterns, but ultimately they are just the same few types of symmetry repeated over and over again in slightly different ways.

Interestingly, I believe that the Mandelbrot fractal does not repeat.
Except for its symmetry, its shape is really different everywhere.
It's kind of fun to zoom in somewhere, and discover that it does not show the repeatable pattern that you would sort of expect.
 
Bacterius said:
Strictly speaking a fractal is any structure which exhibits self-similarly at any scale. So in some sense it kind of has to have a periodic component. But it can still be quite rich in features. For instance, take a look at the Mandelbrot fractal, if you zoom in on it at various levels of detail you tend to see more and more elaborate patterns, but ultimately they are just the same few types of symmetry repeated over and over again in slightly different ways.

Fractal is a structure where its Hausdorff dimension (strictly) exceeds its topological dimension.

See here

.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
10K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top