Enigman
- 647
- 311
The discussion centers on the perception of a PhD as a series of small goals versus a pathway to significant breakthroughs in knowledge. Participants argue that while setting small goals is valid, the ultimate aim should be to make substantial contributions to the field, akin to the revolutionary work of figures like Einstein. The conversation highlights the limitations of a PhD dissertation in achieving groundbreaking discoveries, suggesting that true innovation is more likely to occur later in one's career, beyond the confines of doctoral studies.
PREREQUISITESGraduate students, aspiring researchers, and academic professionals interested in the dynamics of PhD studies and their potential for contributing to significant scientific advancements.
DiracPool said:Talk about setting small goals, is that what you want your career to be? A tiny bump on the surface of the circle of knowledge? If that suits your fancy, go right ahead, but what I want to do is accumulate a bunch of these tiny dents (funded by naive organizations such as NSF and NIH) and burst the bubble like Einstein did!