Is a PhD Just Small Goals or a Path to Breakthroughs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Enigman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phd
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the perception of a PhD as a series of small goals versus a pathway to significant breakthroughs in knowledge. Participants argue that while setting small goals is valid, the ultimate aim should be to make substantial contributions to the field, akin to the revolutionary work of figures like Einstein. The conversation highlights the limitations of a PhD dissertation in achieving groundbreaking discoveries, suggesting that true innovation is more likely to occur later in one's career, beyond the confines of doctoral studies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of PhD program structures and expectations
  • Familiarity with research funding sources such as NSF and NIH
  • Knowledge of historical breakthroughs in physics and their contexts
  • Awareness of the academic career trajectory and its challenges
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of NSF and NIH funding on scientific innovation
  • Explore the historical context of Einstein's contributions to physics
  • Investigate the role of PhD dissertations in academic research
  • Examine career paths of successful physicists post-PhD
USEFUL FOR

Graduate students, aspiring researchers, and academic professionals interested in the dynamics of PhD studies and their potential for contributing to significant scientific advancements.

Physics news on Phys.org
Talk about setting small goals, is that what you want your career to be? A tiny bump on the surface of the circle of knowledge? If that suits your fancy, go right ahead, but what I want to do is accumulate a bunch of these tiny dents (funded by naive organizations such as NSF and NIH) and burst the bubble like Einstein did!
 
DiracPool said:
Talk about setting small goals, is that what you want your career to be? A tiny bump on the surface of the circle of knowledge? If that suits your fancy, go right ahead, but what I want to do is accumulate a bunch of these tiny dents (funded by naive organizations such as NSF and NIH) and burst the bubble like Einstein did!

The post is about a PhD, not the entire career. I really doubt somebody is able to revolutionize physics in a PhD dissertation. The low hanging fruit is simply not there anymore. Later in your career, it might be possible though.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff, PWiz, JorisL and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
12K