Vote for the Breakthrough of the Year

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ygggdrasil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Year
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread discusses the annual vote for the Breakthrough of the Year organized by Science Magazine, highlighting various scientific advancements from 2018. Participants express their preferences among the listed breakthroughs and share opinions on the significance of these discoveries.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express a preference for the impact crater discovery in Greenland, citing the long-term data collection involved.
  • Others favor the "fly brain revealed" breakthrough, emphasizing its potential to open new avenues in neuroscience.
  • Some participants mention that none of the listed breakthroughs resonate with them, suggesting alternative advancements they consider significant.
  • There are discussions regarding the reliability of claims about orangutans communicating about the past, with some participants expressing skepticism and seeking references.
  • A few participants highlight the significance of "development cell by cell," arguing it has broader applications in biology and may have a greater impact than other breakthroughs.
  • One participant compares the impact of single transcriptomics in biology to the detection of gravitational waves in physics, suggesting its transformative potential.
  • Some participants note the relevance of the #MeToo movement in science, questioning its connection to the breakthroughs listed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express multiple competing views regarding their favorite breakthroughs, with no consensus on a single choice. Various opinions on the significance and reliability of the breakthroughs are presented, indicating an unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the breakthroughs lack detailed references or established consensus on their implications. Discussions about the reliability of certain scientific claims remain open-ended, and the significance of breakthroughs is subject to individual interpretation.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in recent scientific advancements, debates on the significance of breakthroughs in various fields, and discussions surrounding the implications of scientific discoveries may find this thread informative.

  • #31
'Me too' shouldn't be on the list simply because it's not a scientific breakthrough. By the same line of thought, we could also put the economic development of India and China in the list since it contributes to a large number of new scientists (and much more so than this 'me too' fad).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
The first round of voting has concluded with the following results:
  • Development cell by cell (22%)
  • An RNA drug enters the clinic (20%)
  • Neutrinos from a blazing galaxy (14%)
  • Fly brain revealed (10%)
  • Rapid chemical structures (8%)
  • An ancient human hybrid (6%)
  • Ice age impact (6%)
  • #MeToo makes a difference (5%)
  • How cells marshal their contents (4%)
  • 500-million-year-old animals (2%)
  • Forensic genealogy comes of age (2%)
  • An astronomical data trove (2%)
The second and final round of voting among the top four choices runs from Dec 6 to Dec 12:
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/12/finalists-are-vote-2018-people-s-choice-breakthrough-year
 
  • #33
Ygggdrasil said:
Development cell by cell (22%)

C'mon! Daddy needs a new pair of shoes!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Auto-Didact
  • #34
The editors at the journal Science have announced their choice for Breakthrough of the Year: Development cell-by-cell
From at least the time of Hippocrates, biologists have been transfixed by the mystery of how a single cell develops into an adult animal with multiple organs and billions of cells. The ancient Greek physician hypothesized that moisture from a mother’s breath helps shape a growing infant, but now we know it is DNA that ultimately orchestrates the processes by which cells multiply and specialize. Now, just as a music score indicates when strings, brass, percussion, and woodwinds chime into create a symphony, a combination of technologies is revealing when genes in individual cells switch on, cueing the cells to play their specialized parts. The result is the ability to track development of organisms and organs in stunning detail, cell by cell and through time. Science is recognizing that combination of technologies, and its potential for spurring advances in basic research and medicine, as the 2018 Breakthrough of the Year.

Driving those advances are techniques for isolating thousands of intact cells from living organisms, efficiently sequencing expressed genetic material in each cell, and using computers, or labeling the cells, to reconstruct their relationships in space and time. That technical trifecta “will transform the next decade of research,” says Nikolaus Rajewsky, a systems biologist at the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in Berlin. This year alone, papers detailed how a flatworm, a fish, a frog, and other organisms begin to make organs and appendages. And groups around the world are applying the techniques to study how human cells mature over a lifetime, how tissues regenerate, and how cells change in diseases.
http://vis.sciencemag.org/breakthrough2018/finalists/#cell-development

Development cell-by-cell also won the vote for the people's choice for breakthrough of the year. Here's the breakdown of the voting:
  • Development cell by cell (35%)
  • An RNA drug enters the clinic (30%)
  • Neutrinos from a blazing galaxy (23%)
  • Fly brain revealed (12%)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith and BillTre

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
10K