I Is a Time Rotation Operator Analogous to Spatial Rotations Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 743765
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian
Click For Summary
The discussion explores the concept of a time rotation operator and its potential analogy to spatial rotations. It highlights that a true "time rotation operator" cannot exist independently, as time is a single dimension that cannot be rotated without involving spatial dimensions. Lorentz boosts are identified as the relevant analogues, combining time and space dimensions in their application. The conversation emphasizes the necessity of integrating spatial dimensions to conceptualize any form of rotation involving time. Ultimately, the relationship between time and space in physics necessitates a multidimensional approach.
member 743765
We studied about the time translation operator and that its generator is the hamiltonian the question is could there be a time rotation operator in analogy with rotations in space and what would be it's relation to relativity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lorentz boost seems what you are looking for.
 
  • Like
Likes member 743765 and Hill
phyahmad said:
could there be a time rotation operator in analogy with rotations in space
There can't be a "time rotation operator" in the sense of just "rotating time" and not affecting "space" at all, because (heuristically) "time" is only one dimension and it makes no sense to "rotate" in just one dimension; you need at least two. So you need to include at least one dimension of space in the rotation.

As @anuttarasammyak points out in post #2, Lorentz boosts are the "time-space rotation" analogues of rotations in ordinary space. Boosts require two dimensions, one of "time" and one of "space" (the "space" dimension is the spatial direction in which the boost is applied).
 
  • Like
Likes member 743765
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K