Is AB Hermitian If A and B Are Hermitian Operators?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics, specifically whether the product of two Hermitian operators, A and B, is also Hermitian. The original poster seeks to prove this relationship and is uncertain about the necessary conditions for the product to maintain Hermitian characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of Hermitian operators and their properties, questioning the significance of the commutator being zero for the product to be Hermitian. Some attempt to manipulate the inner product notation to derive conditions for Hermiticity.

Discussion Status

There are multiple lines of reasoning being explored, with some participants providing algebraic manipulations and others suggesting starting from the definition of Hermitian operators. While some guidance has been offered, there is no explicit consensus on the completeness of the proofs or the necessity of certain steps.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding linear algebra concepts, particularly the adjoint of operators and the implications of using bra-ket notation. This indicates a potential gap in foundational knowledge that may affect their understanding of the problem.

burningbend
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
If A and B are hermitian operators, then AB is hermitian only if the commutator=0.

basically i need to prove that, but i don't really know where to start ofther than the general <f|AB|g> = <g|AB|f>*

obv physics math is not my strong point. thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i understand the proof of a single operator and the expansion of the relation to integral notation, but i don't understand the significance of the multiplication of the operators and why there is the condition there.
 
how's this?

<f|AB|g>=<g|AB|f>*

left=(\sum<g|A|m><m|B|f>)*
left=\sum<m|A*|g><f|B*|m>
left=\sum<f|B*|m><m|A*|g>
left=<f|B*A*|g>
since B and A are Hermitian,
<f|AB|g> = <f|BA|g>
so AB-BA=0

good enough?
 
Last edited:
Begin with the definition of "Hermitian operator" i.e. it is equal to its adjoint, then apply it to AB and see what is necessary to make it Hermitian.

I don't think you need to invoke the "bra", "ket" products.
 
jambaugh said:
Begin with the definition of "Hermitian operator" i.e. it is equal to its adjoint, then apply it to AB and see what is necessary to make it Hermitian.

I don't think you need to invoke the "bra", "ket" products.

so,

AB=(AB)*
AB=B*A*
B and A are Hermitian, so,
AB=BA
AB-BA=0

and that's it?

i haven't had linear algebra (lol) so the (AB)*=B*A* is a little confusing to me, which i kinda figured out based on using the brackets and the completeness relation. so this would be it?
 
burningbend said:
so,

AB=(AB)*
AB=B*A*
B and A are Hermitian, so,
AB=BA
AB-BA=0

and that's it?

i haven't had linear algebra (lol) so the (AB)*=B*A* is a little confusing to me, which i kinda figured out based on using the brackets and the completeness relation. so this would be it?

That's all there is to it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
9
Views
39K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K