If A and B are Hermitian operators is (i A + B ) Hermitian?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of Hermitian operators in the context of quantum mechanics, specifically examining whether the operator (i A + B) is Hermitian when A and B are Hermitian operators. Participants are exploring the implications of the imaginary unit in the expression.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the definition of Hermitian operators and considers the conditions for eigenvalues and eigenfunctions. They express confusion regarding the impact of the imaginary unit on the Hermiticity of the operator. Some participants suggest looking for counterexamples and reference properties of the conjugate transpose operation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants raising questions about the original poster's reasoning and suggesting alternative approaches. There is no explicit consensus yet, but hints and clues have been provided to guide further exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of proving properties of operators in a vector space of quadratic integrable functions, and there is an emphasis on understanding the definitions and properties of Hermitian operators.

Settho
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
OP warned about not using the homework template
If A and B are Hermitian operators is (i A + B ) a Hermitian operator?
(Hint: use the definition of hermiticity used in the vector space where the elements are quadratic integrable functions)

I know an operator is Hermitian if:
- the eigenvalues are real
- the eigenfunction is orthonormal
- the eigenfunctions form a complete basis set.

I know how to prove if A + B is a Hermitian operator, but because of the i in front of A I still am a little bit confused.

So I know to prove if the eigenvalues are real. You have to use these integrals first and prove both sides are the same so that λ = λ*

332up34.png


So I did this:
20qhtar.png


I have doubts about the last one, because I think that is now how it is suppose to go, but I don't know. And then I thought because both sides aren't the same the eigenvalues aren't real and it isn't Hermitian.
io3djr.png


Is this correct? If it isn't how am I suppose to handle this problem?
 

Attachments

  • 332up34.png
    332up34.png
    3.8 KB · Views: 1,562
  • 20qhtar.png
    20qhtar.png
    5.5 KB · Views: 1,397
  • io3djr.png
    io3djr.png
    2.7 KB · Views: 1,297
Physics news on Phys.org
You could always look for a counterexample.
 
Hermitian operators also have the property ##A = A^*##.
 
Settho said:
[...] how am I suppose to handle this problem?
Also trying looking up the properties of the "conjugate transpose" operation on Wikipedia. E.g., what is ##(AB)^* = \;?##
 
A clue: It will be hermitian in the special case where A=0.

One example of this kind of operator are the raising and lowering operators of a harmonic oscillator, where the A and B are multiples of the hermitian position and momentum operators.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K