Is accounting and finance easier than Physics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the perceived difficulty of physics compared to accounting and finance, particularly from the perspective of a physics student contemplating a switch to these fields. Participants share personal experiences and insights regarding the transition between disciplines, the nature of the mathematics involved, and the challenges faced in understanding course material.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses frustration with their physics education, feeling lost despite achieving good grades and considering a switch to accounting or finance.
  • Another participant suggests that if the individual is good at math, they should find economics, accounting, or finance easier than physics.
  • A participant questions how someone could be "clueless" in physics while still maintaining good grades, implying a potential issue with the educational system.
  • Several participants note that many physics majors transition into finance jobs successfully, suggesting that the math in finance is less complex than that in physics.
  • There is mention of the necessity of finance degrees for certain jobs, with some participants indicating that finance classes are perceived as easier than physics classes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that transitioning from physics to finance or accounting is feasible, especially for those with strong mathematical skills. However, there is disagreement regarding the ease of understanding material in these fields, with some expressing skepticism about the participant's claims of being clueless in physics while succeeding academically.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the variability in educational experiences and the potential for differing levels of difficulty in courses, depending on the institution and individual aptitude. There are also concerns about the adequacy of support and guidance in the physics program.

quantumadness
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I used to like physics, until I did a bachelors in it.

In my final year now (at a Top 20 university in the world) and even though I am currently passing with a reasonably good grade, I still don't know what I am doing.

I still sit clueless in lectures, even after 3 whole years. I never get what's going on in the books as they are explained badly, or I just don't get it. Hell I even tried Feynman, and I still find it difficult to go through those books.

So I just rote learn as much as I can and this is how I pass my exams without understanding anything because I never could understand what the hell was going 90% of the time (the physics mainly, but I could understand the vector calculus and algebra math though). We also got taught programming, however I suck at that too because I could never get my head around it to solve problems and frequently had to ask for help.

Given this situation I am considering to switch fields to possibly accounting/finance or even economics after I graduate next year. However, I've heard horror stories that the accounting/finance professional exams are extremely hard.

Since I come from a physics background and going to pass out with a reasonably good grade anyway from a Top 20 university in the world, I was wondering just how difficult would it be for me to switch to Accounting/Finance or even economics?

Or are there any other fields that I can switch to with relative ease where I am not clueless 100% of the time?

Thanks and I greatly appreciate any helpful advice.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you in the US?
 
I did some economics during my BS, and I know a guy who double-majored in physics and economics. We both come from very good universities. From my and his experiences, if you are good at math, then you should have no problems. Math in economics/accounting/finance is much easier than math in physics. As for financial concepts and ideas, try reading some of their textbooks and see whether you can understand them and whether you enjoy reading them.
 
Last edited:
There's no guarantee you won't find yourself sitting in an econ or accounting class and find yourself clueless 100% of the time.

I can't explain how someone who claims to be truly clueless can still be in a physics program getting good grades after three years. The faculty should have caught onto you by now. Or, ..., they're just taking your tuition money and they plan to bounce you out right before graduation.
 
Most definitely. A lot of physics majors I know moved into finance jobs quite easily post graduation. It never really happens the other way around, except for an Econ major I know who changed to physics. But I think he had always been really into physics.
 
radium said:
Most definitely. A lot of physics majors I know moved into finance jobs quite easily post graduation. It never really happens the other way around, except for an Econ major I know who changed to physics. But I think he had always been really into physics.
Did they have to get finance degrees? I know that it was not a requirement in the past for some jobs, but now more and more people advice me to go back back to a university and get a fourth degree (after BS, MS and PhD in physics).
 
No they did not have finance degrees, although a few took finance classes since my school is renowned for the undergraduate business program. The overall response seemed to be that the finance classes are way easier than the physics classes and the math used is at a drastically lower level.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
14K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K