Is Antinatalism a Viable Philosophy for the Future?

  • Thread starter Thread starter houlahound
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
39 replies · 6K views
Antinatalists are not forcing anyone to do anything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
houlahound said:
OK what would be good or bad about less people breeding??

In underpopulated areas it would be bad. In over populated areas it would be good.
 
houlahound said:
You guys with pain is good for you theory are masochists...I'm not going to no party at your place.

Maybe you should get schools to teach mandatory courses in self harm to build character.

Do you refuse pain medication in order to become a better human, I doubt it.

"pain is beneficial for survival" ## \neq ## "I like pain"
 
Cabrera argues that we lack the consent of this person when we act on his behalf through procreation, and that we should respect the idea that someone may prefer never to be born, away from pain and death. Gerald Harrison and Julia Tanner also write about lack of consent, arguing that we have no moral right to significantly affect others without their consent.
This is silly. These people (Cabrera, Harrison, and Tanner) have waaaaay too much time on their hands.

houlahound said:
Well I didn't breed but there was no reason moral or otherwise to it. I eventually got depressed by peer pressure that you need to have children because, because. Nobody could give anything else but lame reasons.
Have you concluded that you have absolutely no good qualities that you would enjoy seeing in your progeny?
houlahound said:
I was horrified to find out how little reason so many folks put into creating life. I swear some people put more effort into choosing kitchen appliances.
Unfortunately, this is true for many people, but it certainly is not true for all.
houlahound said:
I accidently stumbled across antinatalism decades later and used it as a response and claim some moral ground.
To be honest I do feel superior at times for not breeding, I don't know why but I definitely feel one up for it. I know childish right.
Yes, and naive, IMO.

There was a religious sect here in the U.S. in the 19th Century -- the Shakers. They believed in celibacy. To no one's surprise, they died out. The only things they left behind was their style of furniture and a town in Ohio, Shaker Heights.
 
houlahound said:
You guys with pain is good for you theory are masochists...I'm not going to no party at your place.
Pain and its counterpart, pleasure, are both required. Without pain, we couldn't appreciate the things that bring pleasure.

In any case, both of these are relative. I enjoy going for long backpack trips (50 miles+) in very precipitous country that other people would find extremely painful, and is sometimes painful to me. Try walking 15 miles downhill along a ridge with a nickel-sized blister on the ball of your foot. Do I enjoy this pain? Not at all, but the pleasure it gives me to be in such beautiful country greatly outweighs the minor discomfort I get once in a while, when I'm not paying close enough attention to my feet.
houlahound said:
Maybe you should get schools to teach mandatory courses in self harm to build character.
If you're talking about self-mutlilation where people cut themselves for no good reason, then I agree. On the other hand, there's an outfit here in the U.S. called Outward Bound, where lots of kids with no self-esteem and no abilities to deal with nature go through pretty rigourous treks. Most of them are quite surprised to find how much they enjoy it, despite the obvious hardships they face along the way. Not to mention, the feeling of accomplishment they achieve at being able to do something they wouldn't have thought possible.
houlahound said:
Do you refuse pain medication in order to become a better human, I doubt it.
There are a lot of people who are addicted to heroin and other opioids who aren't able to refuse pain medication. Being able to just grit your teeth and get on with it can sometimes be a good thing.

houlahound said:
I find getting the most out of people involves removing all impediments and barriers for them, not hitting their thumb with a hammer.
There's a huge difference between hitting their thumb with a hammer and removing all impediments. People grow when they are faced with hurdles. Without them, they stagnate.
 
houlahound said:
Maybe you should get schools to teach mandatory courses in self harm to build character.

You realize you are saying this to a group of people who majored in math and physics? :-p:-p
 
I'm curious to know how one would consent or deny consent to be born. What/where are you before you are born?
 
Before you were born, you were a fetus.
My son was born a month early, so a late term unborn cold be functional in a survival sense.
Communication with the new born is limited however.
You might be getting smiles, eye looks, or something like that from them,
but they would not understand complex concepts like "Do you want to be not born?"
 
Right. No one has a choice whether or not they want to be born. That decision is up to the parents. So, if you wants kids you can either conceive or adopt. If you don't, put a sock on it. Those are my thoughts on antinatalism. Also that it's a rather pointless discussion. Since none of us choose to be born, go do some good in the world and make it a better place to live.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
Tsu said:
Also that it's a rather pointless discussion. Since none of us choose to be born, go do some good in the world and make it a better place to live.
And that's a good place to end this thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds, OmCheeto and Tsu