Is Axler's Determinant-Free Approach to Linear Algebra Worth Studying?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the merits of studying Axler's determinant-free approach to linear algebra, particularly in the context of preparing for advanced studies in mathematics and theoretical physics. Participants explore various textbooks, their pedagogical strengths, and the relevance of different approaches to linear algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to improve their linear algebra skills and seeks recommendations for textbooks, mentioning prior experience with Anton and interest in Friedberg.
  • Another participant recommends Axler for its clear exposition and pedagogical approach, noting it is more suited for pure mathematics compared to Anton.
  • A participant interested in theoretical physics inquires about the Friedberg book, suggesting it may be the best option.
  • One participant advocates for Axler, highlighting its effectiveness in teaching intuition relevant to quantum mechanics and differential geometry.
  • Another participant suggests looking into "Matrix Analysis" and "Topics in Matrix Analysis" by Horn and Johnson as additional resources.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about Friedberg's pedagogical quality compared to Axler, with one requesting examples of Axler's determinant-free proofs.
  • There is a reiteration that both Axler and Friedberg are excellent texts, with a note that Friedberg covers more material but Axler's approach may be more appealing to some learners.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that both Axler and Friedberg are valuable resources, but there is no consensus on which is superior. Some favor Axler's pedagogical style, while others highlight Friedberg's broader coverage of material.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying preferences based on their academic backgrounds and future studies, indicating that the choice of textbook may depend on individual learning styles and goals.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students in mathematics or theoretical physics seeking to enhance their understanding of linear algebra through different pedagogical approaches.

SeReNiTy
Messages
170
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, During the upcoming summer break I want to patch up my linear algebra skills while researching with my professor. I've already taken a course on linear algebra, but frankly it was rather elementary. This semester after taken courses on differential geometry and further analysis I've realized I'm lacking a lot of the linear algebra required...

So to patch in this gap (more like abyss) I've decided to study a proper course on linear algebra. So my question is what should i cover in my syllabus and what textbook should i use? Previously, I've studied the whole Anton book and I've heard good things about the Friedberg book.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try Axler - it's a cheap paperback with very clear exposition, and proofs that are obviously directed at the undergraduate (carefully thought through and pedagogic). It's a "second course in Linear algebra" according to the author, though it can act as a somewhat intensive first introduction. Unlike Anton, which according to Amazon is "an introduction for... engineering and computer science students", Axler is very much applications-free pure math, there are no matrix-factorization algorithms or problems relating to moments of inertia (things very useful outside of pure math). A less friendly but much more expansive book, at a similar or slightly higher level than Axler, is Hoffman & Kunze.

I take it you're going into mathematics by the courses you've mentioned (analysis, differential geometry). Axler is desgined for students in that position - there are many more 'practical' linear algebra books targeting engineers, and economics majors - they're very different in scope.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm heading into the field of theoretical physics, but the theory i want to study requires a extensive knowledge of mathematics, what do you think about the friedbeg book? I heard it is the best.
 
Then I recommend Axler even more highly. It's good at teaching intution, so it's excellent preparation for quantum mechanics especially, and differential geometry (which you seem to have already studied...) besides uncountable other benefits.

I don't know Friedberg, but I doubt it could be as pedagogic as Axler with his marvelous, determinant-free proofs.
 
Look at Matrix Analysis and Topics in Matrix Analysis by Horn and Johnson.
 
Rach3 said:
I don't know Friedberg, but I doubt it could be as pedagogic as Axler with his marvelous, determinant-free proofs.

Give me a example of one of his determinant-free proofs? I quite liked proofs with wedge products and determinants in diff geom...But i must admit getting your head around the determinant can be tricky!
 
Axler and Friedberg are both excellent texts. Friedberg covers MUCH more material, though. On the other hand you might find Axler's determinant-free approach to be more to your liking.
 
devious_ said:
Axler and Friedberg are both excellent texts. Friedberg covers MUCH more material, though. On the other hand you might find Axler's determinant-free approach to be more to your liking.

Can someone provide me with a example of his determinant free proofs...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K