Is Bush's Moon-Mars Initiative a New Space Frontier?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phobos
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Bush's Moon-Mars Initiative aims to revitalize the U.S. space program by restarting the shuttle program, focusing on long-term human space travel, and developing the Crew Exploration Vehicle for missions to the ISS, moon, and Mars. The plan includes returning to the moon by 2020 and conducting human missions as early as 2015, though skepticism exists regarding funding and political motivations behind the initiative. Critics argue that the initiative may be a political ploy rather than a genuine scientific endeavor, with concerns about the feasibility of manned missions to Mars without a clear purpose. Some participants suggest that establishing a permanent human presence on Mars could be a worthwhile goal, despite the associated risks and costs. Overall, the discussion reflects a mix of enthusiasm for space exploration and caution regarding its political and financial implications.
  • #31
State of the Union

"too many steroids"...

(agh, excuse me,but...Manned Mission to Mars...)

i repeat..."a real Flag..."

(at least 'one' person understands me!)

thanks!

thought i was 'alone' ...
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32


Originally posted by Nereid
Bush? a scientific visionary? Show me ONE THING in his record which supports your hypothesis!

Well, he supports research for more oil drilling in Alaska.

(Yes, I'm kidding.)
 
  • #33


Originally posted by Nereid


Bush? a scientific visionary? Show me ONE THING in his record which supports your hypothesis!


I've been looking for somewhere where Bush is referred to as "a scientific visionary". To whose hypothesis are you alluding?

Also, much has been made in this Topic about the idea that Bush may be doing what he's doing just to get votes. Isn't that what he is supposed to do? It is the job of the president of a democratic nation to actualize the will of the people. The people make their will known by voting for the candidate whose programs most closely match that will. If Bush gains votes with all his talk of reinstituting a manned space program, then a manned space program must be what the American people want.
 
  • #34
LURCH,
Adrian said: "Maybe Bush is a visionary who sees the value of scientific endeavours?" This is his hypothesis. I asked him to provide evidence to support it.
LURCH: Also, much has been made in this Topic about the idea that Bush may be doing what he's doing just to get votes. Isn't that what he is supposed to do?
Of course. What made me depressed is 'the vision thing'. If he had the vision, he'd work on a policy that would have a reasonable chance of success, and if he were to continue in office (or influence those who followed him), there's a fighting chance the vision would see the light of day.

OTOH, if he's merely a vote-seeking automaton, given that a 'man on Mars' is hugely expensive, would take decades to realize, and kill funds for almost all other space science (look at the Shuttle, the ISS), can you construct a realistic scenario under which serious space-based science grows?
LURCH: If Bush gains votes with all his talk of reinstituting a manned space program, then a manned space program must be what the American people want.
The American people's wants cannot be manufactured? The leader is purely passive? The leader has no agenda other than 'do the will of the American people'??
 
  • #35
Mars? Nah

But the moon, on the other hand, makes sense. Look back to history, how many cities started off as a lonely fort in a hostile environment? This could start a new land rush, gold boom, etc. But I seriously doubt that hookers or moon shiners will be the first civies there

On a serious note, I would think that someone could produce new alloys, uncontaminated by trace elements that are unavoidably added by smelting in our atmosphere. This could be one of many reasons for colonizing the moon.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K