Jimmy Snyder
- 1,137
- 21
The discussion revolves around Herman Cain's withdrawal from the presidential candidacy and its implications for his proposed 9-9-9 tax plan. Participants explore the significance of the term "suspend" in the context of his campaign, as well as broader critiques of Cain's qualifications and the media's role in his candidacy.
Participants generally express disagreement on the effectiveness and viability of Cain's candidacy and policies, with multiple competing views on his qualifications and the implications of his withdrawal. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the significance of "suspend" and the future of his 9-9-9 plan.
Some points raised involve assumptions about the political landscape and the motivations behind campaign strategies, which remain unexamined and unresolved in the discussion.
Individuals interested in political strategy, campaign dynamics, and the implications of tax policy proposals may find this discussion relevant.
AlephZero said:Would anybody like to (attempt to) explain the use of "suspend" here? Is it just a euphemism for "quit" or is there some deeper significance? (My cynical little mind wonders if the deeper significance has something to do with who gets to keep any unspent campaign funds...)
Jimmy Snyder said:
Jimmy Snyder said:
Thanks. One good turn deserves another.ThomasT said:Nice turn of phrase.
AlephZero said:Would anybody like to (attempt to) explain the use of "suspend" here? Is it just a euphemism for "quit" or is there some deeper significance? (My cynical little mind wonders if the deeper significance has something to do with who gets to keep any unspent campaign funds...)