News Is Consolidating Obituaries for 2024 a Good Idea?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pinball1970
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the idea of consolidating tributes or announcements related to deceased individuals into a single location. Participants express strong opposition to this approach, arguing that it diminishes the significance of each individual and their contributions. Keeping discussions separate allows for a more organized and respectful opportunity to honor each person's influence and legacy, especially when multiple announcements occur around the same time.

All obituaries in one place for 2024 instead of individual threads?

  • Yes

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • No

    Votes: 5 62.5%
  • Not bothered

    Votes: 2 25.0%

  • Total voters
    8
pinball1970
Gold Member
Messages
3,504
Reaction score
5,529
Put them all in one place for this year?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. The name in the title announces the death to all.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
Frabjous said:
No. The name in the title announces the death to all.
Agreed. I vote NO.
It also gives a more-organized opportunity to discuss the person and their contributions and influence,
especially in the case when there may be two or more recent announcements.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
Back
Top