Is Consulting the Right Career Path After a PhD in Mechanical Engineering?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Topher925
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the considerations and implications of pursuing a career in consulting after completing a PhD in Mechanical Engineering. Participants explore the differences between consulting and traditional engineering roles, including aspects of job satisfaction, work environment, and career development.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concerns about the potential dilution of research-focused work in traditional roles due to meetings and paperwork, suggesting that consulting may allow for more technical problem-solving.
  • Another participant counters that consulting may involve even more administrative tasks, such as self-promotion and contract negotiation, which could detract from technical work.
  • A third participant emphasizes the importance of practical skills and experience, suggesting that the realities of business often require engagement with those outside one's field of expertise.
  • There is a mention that obtaining a Professional Engineer (PE) license typically requires documented hands-on experience in industry, which may be challenging for independent consultants.
  • Another participant reinforces that communication and collaboration are essential in the business world, contrasting it with the more solitary nature of PhD research.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of consulting work compared to traditional engineering roles, with no consensus reached on whether consulting is a preferable path. Concerns about job security, administrative burdens, and the necessity of gaining practical experience are highlighted, indicating ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the realities of the engineering job market, including the balance between technical work and administrative responsibilities. There are also references to the requirements for obtaining a PE license, which may influence career decisions.

Topher925
Messages
1,563
Reaction score
7
I'm finishing up my PhD in Mechanical Engineering in a field with a rather high demand for highly skilled labor. I was originally planning on working in a national lab or industry in an R&D setting as a full time engineer/researcher, but now I'm having second thoughts. I'm concerned that if I work full time at a national lab or company my daily work is going to be diluted with asinine meetings and paperwork instead of focusing on the actual research and thinking part of the job which is why I'm getting a PhD in the first place. I was thinking consulting might be a better option as my daily work tasks would be focused more on technical problem solving rather than filling out paperwork.

The question that's lingering in my mind is whether or not I could actually pull it off. I already do quite a bit of consulting work right now during my graduate studies. I'm actually working on my third consulting job this year. This is work that more or less finds me due to reputation and networking, I don't really go out looking for it. However, I'm still rather young (late 20's) and would eventually like to get my PE license as well so I may just reconsider consulting later on in my career.

So anyone have any experience or strong opinions on engineering consulting? I realize I'll never have any actual job security but will have the opportunity to make a higher salary. Although, a higher salary isn't the end goal.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If anything, I think your work day would be *more* diluted as a consultant. After all, you'll have to spend time promoting yourself, looking for work, negotiating contracts, preparing invoices, etc. etc.

You might want to think about a small startup company. If you aren't one of the founders involved on the business side, a startup is usually very light on meetings... everyone knows the goal, and has their head down pursuing it and doesn't want to waste any time.
 
I will second what TMFKAN64 wrote. Another point: There is education, and there is skill. Though you probably have quite an education you probably do not have much in the way of skills and experience.

The "asinine meetings and paperwork" are the reality of today's business. You will find more of it in larger organizations, but there is no escaping it.

The reality is that your work comes from those who perpetrate the very things you detest. Your place in life exists to help them from their ignorance and they in turn will help you from yours. That's right, you're ignorant too. Nobody is going to throw money your way so that you can have quiet nerdgasms in the lab. You have to promote yourself. You have to write about what you do. You have to teach people who know NOTHING about your field of study and have insufficient aptitude to even begin study.

That's the reality. You exist to help them. They in turn will help you.

Meet them half way.

And by the way, you can get your PE only by documenting significant hands-on experience in industry. You are not likely to get that as a consultant.
 
I would also say that "asinine meetings and paperwork" are more than a reality of today's business, they are a requirement. Communicating your work and requirements to others is a key job function. In a Ph.D. you can often put your head down and work on your own project. That is rare in the outside world.

Also, you need to be supervised by someone with a P.E. to get your own. You can't do that if you're consulting on your own.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K