Is Consuming Wild Boar in Sweden Risky Due to High Radioactivity Levels?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sherwood Botsford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radioactivity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential risks associated with consuming wild boar in Sweden due to high levels of radioactivity, specifically focusing on Cesium-137 contamination. Participants explore the implications of radiation exposure from consuming wild boar meat, including calculations of radiation dose and factors affecting absorption.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a calculation estimating the radiation dose from consuming wild boar, suggesting it could equate to a year's normal radiation dose based on specific assumptions about radiation emissions and body absorption.
  • Another participant challenges the initial calculation, arguing that only a fraction of the cesium ingested is absorbed, providing a rule of thumb that 60,000 Bq of Cs-137 corresponds to 1 mSv upon ingestion.
  • A third participant adds that the initial calculation assumes the entire body mass is replaced by the meat, suggesting that using a more typical body mass would significantly reduce the estimated dose, and notes that some radiation would leave the body, further decreasing the dose.
  • A fourth participant shares a personal anecdote about a radiochemist who calculated safe consumption levels of moose meat with high cesium levels, indicating historical practices related to radiation safety in Sweden.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the accuracy of the initial radiation dose calculation, with multiple competing views regarding the absorption of cesium and the appropriate methodology for estimating risk. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the actual risk of consuming wild boar.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the assumptions made in the calculations, including the fraction of cesium absorbed by the body and the impact of body mass on radiation dose estimates. There are also references to historical practices and regulations concerning meat safety in Sweden.

Sherwood Botsford
Messages
91
Reaction score
22
Recent news story about wild boar in Sweden running about 18,000 bec/kg. I was trying to put this in perspective as to what the risk was for untamed porkchops.

This is a non trivial conversion. Please feel free to correct me:

The primary radiation source is Cesium 137 -- it's a gamma emitter, with a peak around 700 kev.

Radiation exposure in terms of effect is measured in Joules/kg.

1 J = 6.2 E+18 ev. = 6.2 E+15 kev

1 kg of pig = 18,000 emissions/second * 700 kev/event = 2 E-10 Watts.

About 30 million seconds in a year, so about .01 J per kg pig emitted in a year.

Cesium has a residence time in the body of 50 to 100 days. Call it .25 year.

So a 60 kg person eating a kg of pig will get 1/4 year * .01 J = 2.5 mSv or .25 rem.

A person gets about 1/3 of a rem per year So this kg of pig is ballpark a year's normal radiation dose.

Am I correct?

Is my methodology correct?

Note to moderators: This may be more appropriate to the biology subforum. Feel free to move it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that's too much. The point is that only a fraction of the cesium ingested will really be absorbed. As a rule of thumb 60.000 Bq of Cs-137 correspond to 1 mSv on ingestion.
Btw., the high activities found in boar is due to the diet of the boars, namely hypogaeic mushrooms of the genus Elaphomyces.
 
I addition to the fraction of cesium that is not absorbed: You divided the energy by 1 kg, basically assuming the whole body mass is replaced by the meat. Divide it by a more typical body mass of 80 kg (or 60 kg) and the dose goes down a lot. Some of the radiation will also leave the body, reducing the dose even further.
 
When I was an undergraduate (in Sweden) I took a short course in radiation safety (this must have been in 1998). The lecturer was a radiochemist who was also the radiation safety officer for the physics department.
When teaching us how to calculate the absorbed dose he mentioned that he once or twice a year would -illegally- buy moose meat which should have been destroyed (or rather buried) because of the Cs level being too high (>1500 bec/kg) directly from the hunters (at least back then all moose meat had to be tested before you could eat it).
He would then check the level himself and calculate how much he could safely eat
That way he was able to buy some very nice meat very cheaply:biggrin:

He was quite an interesting guy:rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and Drakkith

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 89 ·
3
Replies
89
Views
38K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
29K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K