Is cyber bullying worse than in person bullying?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BenVitale
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the comparison between cyber bullying and in-person bullying, exploring the severity and impact of each form. Participants examine various aspects such as the nature of the bullying, the feelings of vulnerability, and the context in which these interactions occur.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference articles suggesting that cyber bullying may be worse than in-person bullying, prompting a debate on the validity of these claims.
  • One participant argues that in-person bullying is more severe because it is unavoidable, while cyber bullying is elective and can be escaped by logging off.
  • This participant questions the conclusions drawn by researchers, suggesting that the sampling may be skewed and that the feelings of vulnerability in cyber bullying may be overstated.
  • Another participant notes that cyber bullies may feel a sense of security due to anonymity, which could lead to more severe verbal attacks compared to face-to-face interactions.
  • There is a suggestion that the lack of accountability in online environments may contribute to the perception that cyber bullying is worse.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether cyber bullying is worse than in-person bullying, with no consensus reached. Some argue for the severity of in-person bullying, while others highlight the unique challenges posed by cyber bullying.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the real effects of both forms of bullying but do not resolve the question of which is worse, leaving the discussion open to interpretation and further exploration.

BenVitale
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
According to this article : http://www.news.com.au/technology/sticks-and-stones-may-break-my-bones-but-cyber-bullying-really-hurts-me/story-e6frfro0-1225927833343

Do you agree that cyber bullying is worse than in person, face to face?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Computer science news on Phys.org
BenVitale said:
According to this article : http://www.news.com.au/technology/sticks-and-stones-may-break-my-bones-but-cyber-bullying-really-hurts-me/story-e6frfro0-1225927833343

Do you agree that cyber bullying is worse than in person, face to face?

no, disagree. let's step back and think about which is an elective activity and which is not. a kid has no choice but walk home from school, and possibly be accosted by bullies. there's always a choice involved in logging on to facebook, or whether to pay any attention to cyber-taunting. one cannot easily (or at all) be turned off, and one is as easy as walking away from it or logging off.

the article puts figures to their conclusions and thus appears to lend credence to their hypotheses, but (so far as the article is concerned... i have not delved into further detail of the study for instance) i conjecture that the sampling is skewed due to the population having certain characteristics that may not be common to both groups (i.e. the physically bullied and the digitally bullied).

one more point: "Cyber-bullying victims do not see and may not even know who their harasser is, which can make them feel more vulnerable". huh? wait a sec. being physically attacked every day during or after school somehow makes one feel *less* vulnerable than engaging in an elective activity that one can painlessly log off from and escape? what a bizarre world these researchers live in, that they can conclude that physical abuse appears preferable to digital. essentially, "never have i felt more vulnerable than sitting in front of a computer monitor, helplessly strapped to facebook absorbing taunt after taunt. i so wish i were being chased down the street, having my stomach kicked, coat torn and mud stuffed down my shirt. oh the good old days!"

hogwash.

now, no one conclude i think that cyber-bullying isn't real, or doesn't have real results. i agree it is, and does. I'm simply responding to the question of degree.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What do you think of this http://www.geektown.ca/2010/10/student-death-raises-cyber-bullying-issue-.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The cyber-bully doesn't have to be anonymous though. Whether or not they are, the internet offers them a sense of security and obscurity. I would even say that anything devolves when a structure of accountability is missing or diminishing. As for the person who feels victimized, I suppose it could even stem from not having an outlet or any sense of justice from the situation that could lead people to feel it's worse than verbal abuse spoken by peers or others in a face-to-face situation. Either way, I think it's safe to say that the majority of people feel safer saying horrendous things to others when they're saying it in an environment with no consequences. Obviously that doesn't stand for every situation, but I think that's a fair generalization.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K