Could Dark Matter Be the Fifth Fundamental Force of Nature?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Recent discussions highlight a groundbreaking theory proposing the existence of a fifth fundamental force of nature, supported by findings from a paper published in Physical Review Letters by theoretical physicists at the University of California, Irvine. This theory is linked to the potential discovery of a previously unknown subatomic particle, specifically a 16 MeV boson, which may explain anomalies in Beryllium nuclear transitions. The paper titled "Protophobic Fifth-Force Interpretation of the Observed Anomaly in Be8 Nuclear Transitions" by Feng et al. offers insights into this phenomenon, while a follow-up paper discusses the 17 MeV anomaly. However, skepticism remains regarding the model's ability to explain dark matter due to the rapid decay of the proposed particle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of subatomic particles and their interactions
  • Familiarity with the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Knowledge of nuclear transitions and anomalies in particle physics
  • Experience with academic research and peer-reviewed publications
NEXT STEPS
  • Read the paper "Protophobic Fifth-Force Interpretation of the Observed Anomaly in Be8 Nuclear Transitions" by Feng et al.
  • Explore the follow-up paper "Particle Physics Models for the 17 MeV Anomaly in Beryllium Nuclear Decays"
  • Investigate the implications of the anomalous proton radius from muonic hydrogen measurements
  • Review articles discussing the experimental results from the Hungarian physics lab in Quanta and Nature
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in particle physics, and students interested in the latest theories regarding fundamental forces and dark matter.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
551
At last a theory of Dark matter that can be tested, is there a fundamental reason why this theory may be true?

Recent findings indicating the possible discovery of a previously unknown subatomic particle may be evidence of a fifth fundamental force of nature, according to a paper published in the journal Physical Review Letters by theoretical physicists at the University of California, IrvineRecent findings indicating the possible discovery of a previously unknown subatomic particle may be evidence of a fifth fundamental force of nature, according to a paper published in the journal Physical Review Letters by theoretical physicists at the University of California, IrvineRecent findings indicating the possible discovery of a previously unknown subatomic particle may be evidence of a fifth fundamental force of nature, according to a paper published in the journal Physical Review Letters by theoretical physicists at the University of California, IrvineRecent findings indicating the possible discovery of a previously unknown subatomic particle may be evidence of a fifth fundamental force of nature, according to a paper published in the journal Physical Review Letters by theoretical physicists at the University of California, Irvine
 
Space news on Phys.org
Impossible to judge without a paper reference.
 
The reference is to a paper by Feng, et al, offering an explanation for the 16MeV boson "discovered" by the Hungarian group. The paper, Protophobic Fifth-Force Interpretation of the Observed Anomaly in Be8 Nuclear Transitions, was published in last week's PRL and is on the arXiv.
[PLAIN]http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.03591[/PLAIN]
They also have a follow-up paper, Particle Physics Models for the 17 MeV Anomaly in Beryllium Nuclear Decays, also on the arXiv.[PLAIN]http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.03591[/PLAIN]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
websterling said:
The reference is to a paper by Feng, et al, offering an explanation for the 16MeV boson "discovered" by the Hungarian group. The paper, Protophobic Fifth-Force Interpretation of the Observed Anomaly in Be8 Nuclear Transitions, was published in last week's PRL and is on the arXiv.
They also have a follow-up paper, Particle Physics Models for the 17 MeV Anomaly in Beryllium Nuclear Decays, also on the arXiv.
Interesting. It looks like this paper mostly looks at a single experimental result. If this idea turns out to also explain multiple additional discrepancies with regard to the standard model (such as the anomalous proton radius from muonic hydrogen measurements), then they might be on to something.

I'm not sure that this model can explain dark matter, however, as the proposed particle decays rapidly. It seems that the only connection this proposal has with dark matter is that it's a proposed new particle beyond the standard model, just as dark matter typically is.
 
The hunt continues. A couple of other recent entries of interest include http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.03691, Dark Side of the Standard Model: Dormant New Physics Awaken and http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.04056, Interpretations of the possible 42.7 GeV γ-ray line. @wolram try to avoid news articles as references. The gold standard is publication in a peer reviewed journal. Arxiv is usually good providing the paper has at least been submitted to an acceptable journal.
 
Last edited:
I was wondering where the discussion of this experiment was to be found. It's very interesting, and would seriously shake up the standard model. The reason that I'm hesitant though is it's mass. It's very low energy compared to say the Higgs boson. We've had the ability to create energies at the level required to create the particle since the 1950s, why are we just seeing it now?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: newjerseyrunner

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K