Is dark/vacuum potential energy infinite?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of potential energy associated with dark energy, vacuum energy, and virtual particles. Participants explore whether this potential energy is infinite and how it relates to the laws of conservation of energy, particularly in the context of an expanding universe.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the potential energy of dark energy is infinite as more dark energy is created.
  • Others assert that virtual particles are a mathematical concept and do not possess potential energy, challenging the idea of infinite potential energy associated with them.
  • There are claims that the conservation of energy does not apply on cosmological scales, suggesting that energy may be created as the universe expands.
  • Participants discuss the implications of redshift on photon energy, arguing that as space expands, the energy of photons decreases, which raises questions about energy conservation.
  • Some participants express confusion about the concept of potential energy in this context and seek clarification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether potential energy can be considered infinite. There are multiple competing views regarding the implications of dark energy, virtual particles, and the conservation of energy in an expanding universe.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved definitions of potential energy in relation to dark energy and virtual particles, as well as the implications of energy conservation on cosmological scales.

Noduagga
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
And virtual particles potential energy is infinite too?
As more and more dark energy is created does this mean that the potential energy of dark energy is infinite? Does that happen for virtual particles in vacuum and vacuum energy too?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As has been explained over and over on this forum, virtual particles are not real, they are a useful mathematical fiction. Non-existent things don't HAVE potential energy.

The total amount of dark energy in the universe increases over time but that does not imply infinite "potential energy". For that matter, what IS the "potential energy" of dark energy? Can you define that in any quantifiable way?
 
Noduagga said:
And virtual particles potential energy is infinite too?
As more and more dark energy is created does this mean that the potential energy of dark energy is infinite? Does that happen for virtual particles in vacuum and vacuum energy too?
Do you remember the Law of Conservation of Energy and Matter? It says energy can't be created or destroyed but converted to other forms (.ie. matter).
For infinite energy to exist there must first be infinite matter.
 
Zypheros_Knight said:
Do you remember the Law of Conservation of Energy and Matter? It says energy can't be created or destroyed but converted to other forms (.ie. matter).
For infinite energy to exist there must first be infinite matter.
As has been explained MANY times on this forum, conservation of energy does not apply on cosmological scales.
 
phinds said:
As has been explained MANY times on this forum, conservation of energy does not apply on cosmological scales.
I'm new, sorry!
 
Noduagga said:
And virtual particles potential energy is infinite too?
As more and more dark energy is created does this mean that the potential energy of dark energy is infinite? Does that happen for virtual particles in vacuum and vacuum energy too?
The universe is expanding, the energy density remains constant, so, in essence you could say that energy is being created (and the Law of Energy Conservation violated). We do not know much about the universe at the moment as the universe is still very young. However, I still don't understand the ''Potential Energy'' part of your question!

Edit*: I looked at the question again and noticed that you were implying that energy has energy?
 
Zypheros_Knight said:
The universe is expanding, the energy density remains constant, so, in essence you could say that energy is being created (and the Law of Energy Conservation violated). We do not know much about the universe at the moment as the universe is still very young. However, I still don't understand the ''Potential Energy'' part of your question!

Edit*: I looked at the question again and noticed that you were implying that energy has energy?
AGAIN, conservation of energy is NOT violated because it does not apply on cosmological scales.
 
phinds said:
AGAIN, conservation of energy is NOT violated because it does not apply on cosmological scales.
What about in redshift of a photon? If the space expands the wavelength of the photon increases,as energy is inversely proportional to wavelength that means that the energy of the photon decreases when space expands,thus, the Law of Energy Conservation is not conserved!
 
Zypheros_Knight said:
What about in redshift of a photon? If the space expands the wavelength of the photon increases,as energy is inversely proportional to wavelength that means that the energy of the photon decreases when space expands,thus, the Law of Energy Conservation is not conserved!
Exactly. As I keep saying it doesn't apply on cosmological scales.

This whole bit of the photon's energy just evaporating was hard for me to wrap my head around at first, but it's supported by all the evidence.
 
  • #10
...the potential dark energy that can be created is iinfiinite? Does this happens also with vacuum energy and virtual particles in vacuum? (Since there is an infinite number of potential virtual particles the total energy of those particles is infinite)?
 
  • #11
Noduagga said:
...the potential dark energy that can be created is iinfiinite? Does this happens also with vacuum energy and virtual particles in vacuum? (Since there is an infinite number of potential virtual particles the total energy of those particles is infinite)?
Didn't you already ask this and get answers? Did you not like the answers you were provided?
 
  • #13
berkeman said:
Didn't you already ask this and get answers?
Yes, I merged them back together.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K