Is E Always Greater Than V(x) in the Time-Independent Schrodinger Equation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter robotopia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that in the context of the time-independent Schrödinger equation (TISE), the energy E must exceed the minimum potential value V(x) for every normalizable solution. This conclusion is derived from the analysis of the second derivative of the wave function ψ, which must maintain consistent sign properties. The proof demonstrates that if E is less than V_min, the wave function cannot be normalized, leading to a contradiction. Furthermore, the argument extends to complex wave functions, as both the real and imaginary components must approach zero at infinity while adhering to the same sign conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the time-independent Schrödinger equation (TISE)
  • Familiarity with wave function normalization concepts
  • Knowledge of potential energy functions in quantum mechanics
  • Basic grasp of calculus, particularly derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of wave function normalization in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the properties of complex wave functions in quantum systems
  • Learn about the linearity of the Schrödinger equation and its consequences
  • Investigate classical analogs of quantum mechanical principles
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists analyzing wave functions, and researchers exploring the implications of the Schrödinger equation in various potential landscapes.

robotopia
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm looking for feedback on my answer to the following question (if my proof has holes in it, etc.) In particular, I've tacitly assumed that ψ is real. Does this extend naturally to complex ψ? Or don't I have to worry about that?

Problem 2.2 from Griffiths' Intro to QM:

Show that E must exceed the minimum value of V(x) for every normalizable solution to the time-independent Schrödinger equation. What is the classical analog to this statement? Hint: Rewrite Equation 2.4 in the form
\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2} = \frac{2m}{\hbar^2} [V(x) - E]\psi;
if E < V_\text{min}, then ψ and its second derviative always have the same sign—argue that such a function cannot be normalized.

My attempt:
Assume both E < V_\text{min} and ψ is normalizable. Then, as stated in the question, ψ and \frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2} always have the same sign. Moreover, normalizability requires that
\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \psi = 0<br /> \qquad \text{and} \qquad<br /> \lim_{x \rightarrow -\infty} \psi = 0.
ψ cannot be zero everywhere (which is not normalizable), and must therefore either have a non-zero global maximum or a non-zero global minimum (or both). Moreover, since ψ asymptotes to zero at both ends, we can say that ψ must have either a positive global maximum, or a negative global minimum (or both).

Suppose ψ has a positive global maximum at x=x_\text{max} . Then \psi(x_\text{max}) is positive, and because E&lt;V_\text{min}, so is \frac{d^2}{dx^2}\psi(x_\text{max}). But \frac{d^2}{dx^2}\psi(x_\text{max}) must be negative, since it is a local (as well as a global) maximum. Contradiction.

Similarly (by exchanging all ‘maximum’s with ‘minimum’s and all ‘positive’s with ‘negative’s), ψ cannot have a negative global minimum. This contradiction allows us to say that if E&lt;V_\text{min}, then ψ is not normalizable. QED
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The proof automatically generalizes to complex ψ because the real and complex parts of the wave function must separately go to zero at ±∞ while satisfying the condition of signs you talk about so well separately.So it should hold.An interesting thing to note probably is that this is true only because the TISE is linear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K