Is empty set part of every set?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sozener1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Empty Set
Click For Summary
The empty set is a subset of every set, including the power set of any set, such as p(s). However, it is not an element of every set, and in this case, it is not an element of set d. When determining the intersection of p(s) and d, the empty set is not included as an element because it is not found in set d, despite being a subset of both p(s) and the intersection. The distinction between being a subset and being an element is crucial in set theory discussions. Thus, while the empty set is part of the power set, it does not contribute to the intersection with set d.
sozener1
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
is empty set part of every set??

you have a power set of s

represented by p(s)

and s is { x is integer and either x=<-2 or x>=5}

and you have another set d = {{-3 -2 1}, {4}, {6, 7}, {-5, 6, 9}}


when you are asked for intersection of p(s) and d in a plain maths question

am I meant to include { } the empty set as well since it is a subset of everyset?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
sozener1 said:
you have a power set of s

represented by p(s)

and s is { x is integer and either x=<-2 or x>=5}

and you have another set d = {{-3 -2 1}, {4}, {6, 7}, {-5, 6, 9}}


when you are asked for intersection of p(s) and d in a plain maths question

am I meant to include { } the empty set as well since it is a subset of everyset?

The empty set is a subset of every set. But it is not an element of every set.

In the question above, how many elements are in set d? Of those elements, which are members of p(s)?
 
sozener1 said:
you have a power set of s

represented by p(s)

and s is { x is integer and either x=<-2 or x>=5}

and you have another set d = {{-3 -2 1}, {4}, {6, 7}, {-5, 6, 9}}


when you are asked for intersection of p(s) and d in a plain maths question

am I meant to include { } the empty set as well since it is a subset of everyset?

{} is a subset of every set, so it is a subset of s. Therefore, {} is an element of p(s). However, it is clear that {} is not in set d. Therefore, {} is not an element of the intersection of p(s) and d.

Hope that answers your question.
 
The empty set is an actual element of the power set.
The empty set is also a subset of the power set.
The empty set is not an actual element of d.
The empty set is a subset of d.

The intersection considers elements of both sets, so the empty set is not an element of the intersection. But, the empty set is a subset of the intersection.

The fact that the empty set is an element of the power set means that in addition to the empty set being a subset of the power set, the "set of the empty set" is also a subset of the power set, but this is not true for d. This is the difference.
 
When speaking about sets, it's tempting to use phrases that don't have precise definitions like "is a part of" and "is contained in" or "contains". This question is a good example of why the more specific phrases "is a subset of" and "is an element of" are needed.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K