Is Energy Truly Eternal and Infinite?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter throng
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Infinity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the philosophical implications of energy's indestructibility, asserting that energy cannot be created or destroyed, which leads to the conclusion that energy is eternal and potentially infinite. Participants debate the concept of energy's existence in relation to the Big Bang, with some arguing that cosmologists do not claim the singularity originated from nothing. The conversation highlights the relationship between energy, time, and entropy, suggesting that while energy exists, its eternal nature is contested.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the First Law of Thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with concepts of entropy and its implications
  • Basic knowledge of cosmology, particularly the Big Bang theory
  • Philosophical concepts regarding existence and time
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the First Law of Thermodynamics and its implications for energy conservation
  • Explore the relationship between entropy and the arrow of time
  • Study the Big Bang theory and its interpretations in modern cosmology
  • Investigate philosophical perspectives on existence and the nature of reality
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, physicists, cosmologists, and anyone interested in the intersection of science and philosophy regarding the nature of energy and existence.

throng
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I resist posting as I have very little physics or math knowledge. I read quite a lot and would like to seek veiws on the following.

Energy can't be created or destroyed.

That implies it is eternal.

If it is eternal it is infinite, at least in duration.


Is it fair to say:

Energy exists - We are conscious of it.

Energy is eternal - Can't create or destroy it.

Energy is infinite - Eternity is infinite.


What are the implications of the indestructibility of energy?



I'm writing an artical on areas that science, religion and philosophy agree apon, and would appreciate any insight in this area.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Energy can't be created or destroyed?" The key word here is created and what does this actually mean?

Man people believe the big bang singularity just popped into existence and was not created by anyone or any existence whatsoever: So instead of energy being created by anyone or any existence whatsoever what man calls energy existing could have also just popped into existence along with everything else and would then have existed "only" for 15 billion years or so and a finite quantity of time.
 
ronjanec said:
Man people believe the big bang singularity just popped into existence and was not created by anyone or any existence whatsoever:
I disagree, "Man" doesn't believe this. There may be some people who do but cosmologists AFAIK don't even address the origin of the singularity in question so they don't assume that it popped out of nothing.

EDIT: Oops, surely you meant "many" and not "Man"...
 
throng said:
What are the implications of the indestructibility of energy?
Philosophically, it implies that existence is for all time.
 
Sorry, I did mean many not man...
 
out of whack said:
Philosophically, it implies that existence is for all time.


This implies that time is eternal.

Matter must have begun in a finite past, by the law of entropy.



The universe is of a primary singularity or "first movement".

I'd imagine the movement as the beginning of time, because in an instant or at light speed there is no movement. It seems movement is related to the passage of time somehow.

As entropy affects movement its force disperses into a miriad of lesser pairs, so movement slows and temperature becomes infinitely low.

Matter would sit still, evenly dispersed in space.

If infinite entopy is possible then the future is infinite. Without movement there's no light and we start losing a definition of time. (wont go there)


Anyway it seems it is not concurred that energy is eternal or infinite but in that we are conscious of it, it exists, at least for now.

I hope my thermodynamics is not inane.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K