Is Equation a Total Derivative?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation dz = 2ln(y)dx + (x/y)dy is not a total derivative. The reasoning is based on the examination of mixed second derivatives, which yield different results when calculated from the partial derivatives of a potential function F(x,y). Specifically, the derived equations show that the mixed second derivatives do not match, confirming that no function F exists that satisfies the total derivative condition. Additionally, when analyzing the expression x^{\alpha}y^{\beta}(2ln(y)dx + (x/y)dy), the solution requires setting β to 0 and α to 1 for the expression to represent a total derivative.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of total derivatives and partial derivatives
  • Familiarity with mixed partial derivatives
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their derivatives
  • Basic calculus concepts, including differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of total derivatives in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about the implications of mixed partial derivatives and Clairaut's theorem
  • Explore the method of finding potential functions for differential forms
  • Investigate the application of logarithmic differentiation in solving complex equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and differential equations, as well as anyone interested in understanding the conditions for total derivatives in multivariable functions.

Lindsayyyy
Messages
215
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is the following equation a total derivative?

dz = 2ln(y)dx+{\frac x y}dy

Homework Equations


-


The Attempt at a Solution



I would say no. I tried it with the symmetry of the second derivatives.

2ln(y) is {\frac {\partial z} {\partial x}}

when I derivate it now and say y is my variable I get:

{\frac {\partial z} {\partial y}}=\frac 2 y

same for the other expression

{\frac {\partial z} {\partial y}}=\frac x y

{\frac {\partial z} {\partial x}}=\frac 1 y


so they are different => no totale derivative. Am I right or where did I do mistakes?

Thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Lindsayyyy! :wink:

That's completelyyyy right. :smile:

(just to check, I like to differentiate the obvious possibility, xlny, and that gives lnydx + xdy/y, which doesn't match)
 
Thank you very much:smile:
 
Just to put my oar in, if that were a total derivative, there would exist a function, F(x,y) such that
\frac{dF}= \frac{\partial F}{\partial x}dx+ \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}dy
\frac{dF}= 2 ln(y)dx+ \frac{x}{y}dy
..
So we must have \partial F/\partial x= 2 ln(y) so F= 2x ln(y)+ \phi(y) where \phi(y) can be any differentiable function of y only.

From that \partial F/\partial y= 2x/y+ \phi'(y) and that must be equal to x/y: 2x/y+ \phi'(y)= x/y so \phi'(y)= -x/y which is impossible since \phi'(y) is not a function of y.

Note the "mixed second derivatives". If \partial F/\partial y= x/y+ \phi'(y)
then \partial^2 F/\partial x\partial y= 1/y and if \partial F/\partial x= 2ln(y) then \partial^2 F/\partial y\partial x= 2/y. Those mixed second derivatives should be the same and that was what you were checking.
 
your solution is way more elegant than mine :smile:

I have another problem:

x^{\alpha}y^{\beta}(2ln(y)dx+{\frac x y}dy) is given. I shall find alpha and beta that the given expression is a total derivative.

My approach:

I found { \frac {\partial^{2}z} {\partial x \partial y}}=2\beta x^{\alpha}y^{\beta -1}ln(y)+{\frac 1 y}2x^{\alpha}y^{\beta}

and
{ \frac {\partial^{2}z} {\partial y \partial x}}=\alpha x^{\alpha -1}y^{\beta}{\frac x y}+{\frac {x^{\alpha}y^{\beta}} y}

I though I could equate them and solve the equation to get an expression for alpha and beta. But my problem is I can easily cancel some terms with potential rules like y^a-1=y^a/y etc.

And I get to the euqation:

2\beta lny+2 = \alpha+1

is my approach wrong, where are my mistakes? If I was right thus far, how should I go on?

Thanks for your help
 
Lindsayyyy said:
...
And I get to the euqation:

2\beta lny+2 = \alpha+1

is my approach wrong, where are my mistakes? If I was right thus far, how should I go on?

Thanks for your help
There is no y on the right hand side, so what must β be ?
 
fail

\beta =0 \alpha =1

thanks, I'm blind, I know it's a bit too much and insolent to ask but you haven't calculated it by yourself in order to test if I was right until the last step, have you?

Thanks for your help

edit:

nevermind, I'm tired^^
I haven't thought about just to put it in and derive it haha. It works. thanks
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K