MHB Is Every Convex Combination of Elements in a Convex Set Also in the Set?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combination Convex
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
I quote a question from Yahoo! Answers

I need to Show the Following
if S is a convex set and x1, x2, x3, . . . xn are n elements in S then Their convex combination is also in S .
Please help me .
Thanxs

I have given a link to the topic there so the OP can see my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Firstly, we prove that if $x=\alpha_1x_1+\alpha_2x_2+\alpha_3x_3$ for $\alpha_i\ge 0$ and $\sum_i\alpha_i=1$, then $x\in S$. Consider $$\alpha'_i=\frac{\alpha_i}{\alpha_1+\alpha_2} \quad (i=1,2)$$ Note that $\sum_i\alpha'_i=1$ and $\alpha'_i\ge 0.$ We have $$x=\alpha_1x_1+\alpha_2x_2+\alpha_3x_3=(\alpha_1+\alpha_2)(\alpha'_1x_1+\alpha'_2x_2)+\alpha_3x_3$$ By hypothesis $\alpha'_1x_1+\alpha'_2x_2\in S.$ Denote $x_4=\alpha'_1x_1+\alpha'_2x_2$, then $$x=(\alpha_1+\alpha_2)x_4+\alpha_3$$ But $x$ is a convex combination of two elements of $S$, so $x\in S.$ This argument can be generalized for any $i$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top