Is expansion a result of gravity?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter binbots
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the expansion of space-time and its relationship to gravity, particularly in the context of galaxies and dark energy. Participants explore various models and analogies to understand the mechanisms behind cosmic expansion, including the implications of gravity and the role of dark energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the expansion of space-time is a result of gravity, using a trampoline analogy where galaxies create dents in space-time that affect the distance between them.
  • Another participant argues that the expansion of the universe is derived from a model that assumes homogeneity and isotropy, indicating that individual galaxies do not influence this expansion.
  • A third participant critiques the rubber sheet analogy, claiming it adds confusion and emphasizes the complexity of cosmology, which requires advanced mathematical understanding.
  • Another viewpoint introduces a model involving Hubble expansion, suggesting a dynamic interplay of repulsive and attractive forces at a fractal level, positing that dark matter may not be matter but rather a temporary alteration of the field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between gravity and the expansion of the universe, with no consensus reached on whether gravity alone can account for cosmic expansion or the necessity of dark energy. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of analogies in explaining complex cosmological concepts and the dependence on mathematical frameworks for understanding the universe's expansion. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the nature of dark energy and dark matter.

binbots
Messages
170
Reaction score
3
Is the expansion of space time a result of a galaxies gravity? If we take the classic trampoline example of space time I can explain what I mean. Each galaxy makes a dent in the trampoline, the more mass a galaxy gains the deeper the dent. Now if we take 2 bowling balls and place them far enough away on our trampoline that they don’t get stuck in each other’s dent then the space between them will stretch. As each galaxy gains more mass or fall into their own black hole then the space will continue to expand. It seems that the expansion of space time is a result of gravity. So why do we require dark energy?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You are stretching the analogy of bowling balls on trampolines a bit far here. To derive the expansion of the universe, we actually consider the universe to be completely homogeneous and isotropic. That is, there are no density fluctuations (galaxies, people, planets, stars, anything!). This is actually a fairly good assumption on very large distance scales. When we do this, and work through the maths, we simply find a dynamic universe, that is one that is in general expanding or contracting. And observational evidence shows, of course, that it is expanding.

Individual galaxies really have nothing to do with it. And dark energy is only postulated to explain the acceleration of the expansion of the universe.
 
The rubber sheet analogy creates more confusion than it dispells. It is wonderful for the unwashed masses - not so good for those who think outside the box. The tripping block is math. Cosmology is impossibly complex for those lacking advanced math skills.
 
Last edited:
The Hubble universe constantly expands (all zones or spheres, some of which might be as small as the Planck length, do not necessarily contract after expansion) and inrushing energy feeds the spinning fractal. As in the vortex of a tornado, the spin draws in surrounding energy leaving a depleted zone around the vortex-sphere. This third vacuum, a surface-vacuum, attracts other fractals, while the constantly expanding (Hubble expansion) spinning surface repels them. The dynamic thus created between repulsive and attractive forces is the dynamic tension that underlies all matter. At this pre-particle, fractal level no thing exists that can interfere with the expanding and spinning vortex. Stability and permanence and inertia are created by Hubble expansion. Dark matter, and its theoretic “extra” gravity, may not be matter – but the temporary attenuation of the every part of the field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K