Is Φ a Bijective Map from Power Set to Characteristic Functions?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the map \(\Phi\) from the power set of a set \(X\) to the set of characteristic functions defined on \(X\). Participants explore whether \(\Phi\) is bijective by verifying its injectivity and surjectivity, and they seek to define an inverse map.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that \(\Phi\) is surjective because for every function in the range, there exists a corresponding subset in the power set of \(X\).
  • Others argue that \(\Phi\) is injective, suggesting that if two subsets have the same characteristic function, they must be equal.
  • A participant questions how to explicitly define the inverse map \(\Psi\) and suggests that it should map a function \(f\) back to the subset \(A\) defined by the characteristic function.
  • Another participant clarifies that the subset \(A\) should consist of elements \(x\) in \(X\) for which \(f(x) = 1\).
  • There is a suggestion to work out the compositions \(\Psi \circ \Phi\) and \(\Phi \circ \Psi\) to confirm the bijection.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the properties of \(\Phi\) being injective and surjective, but the discussion includes varying levels of detail and understanding regarding the definitions and proofs involved. The exact formulation of the inverse map remains a point of exploration.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions and the steps needed to prove the bijection, indicating that further clarification is necessary for complete understanding.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $X$ be a set. We consider the map \begin{equation*}\Phi : \ \mathcal{P}(X)\rightarrow \{0,1\}^X, \ \ A\mapsto 1_A\end{equation*} that maps a subset $A\subset X$to its characteristc function $1_A$.

I want to show in the following two ways that $\Phi$ is bijective:
  1. verify directly that $\Phi$ is injective and surjective
  2. give explicitly an inverse map

Could you give me a hint how we can show that? I don't really have an idea. (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

Let $X$ be a set. We consider the map \begin{equation*}\Phi : \ \mathcal{P}(X)\rightarrow \{0,1\}^X, \ \ A\mapsto 1_A\end{equation*} that maps a subset $A\subset X$to its characteristc function $1_A$.

I want to show in the following two ways that $\Phi$ is bijective:
  1. verify directly that $\Phi$ is injective and surjective
  2. give explicitly an inverse map

Could you give me a hint how we can show that? I don't really have an idea. (Wondering)

Hey mathmari!

Let's look at an example.
Suppose $X=\{1,2,3\}$, can we find the answers then? (Wondering)
 
I like Serena said:
Let's look at an example.
Suppose $X=\{1,2,3\}$, can we find the answers then? (Wondering)

Using the first way:

$\Phi$ is surjective because for every element of in the range, i.e. $0$ and $1$ there is a preimage in $\mathcal{P}(X)$ because either one element is contained in the set $A$ or not.

$\Phi$ is injective because every element of $\Phi (X)$ has an image in $\{0,1\}$.

So, $\Phi$ is bijective.

Is everything correct so far?
Using the second way:

Can we determine the inverse? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
$\Phi$ is surjective because for every element of in the range, i.e. $0$ and $1$ there is a preimage in $\mathcal{P}(X)$ because either one element is contained in the set $A$ or not.
You probably need to say a bit more. Start by considering an element of $\{0,1\}^X$, namely a function $f:X\to\{0,1\}$. Can you find an element of $\mathcal P(X)$, namely a subset $A$ of $X$, such that $\Phi(A)=f$?

mathmari said:
$\Phi$ is injective because every element of $\Phi (X)$ has an image in $\{0,1\}$.
No, not that way. Consider two elements of $\mathcal P(X)$, namely subsets $A$ and $B$ of $X$. Suppose $\Phi(A)=\Phi(B)$, i.e. their characteristic functions are equal, $1_A=1_B$. Can you show from this that the subsets must be equal, $A=B$? To do so, let $x\in A$ and show that $x\in B$, which will prove that $A\subseteq B$. The reverse inclusion will follow by symmetry.

mathmari said:
Can we determine the inverse?
Here’s a hint: the method used in proving surjectivity can come in handy here. It will help you find a function $\Psi:\{0,1\}^X\to\mathcal P(X)$ such that $\Psi\circ\Phi=\Phi\circ\Psi=I_{\mathcal P(X)}$ (the identity map on the power set of $X$). (Happy)
 
Olinguito said:
You probably need to say a bit more. Start by considering an element of $\{0,1\}^X$, namely a function $f:X\to\{0,1\}$. Can you find an element of $\mathcal P(X)$, namely a subset $A$ of $X$, such that $\Phi(A)=f$?


We set $A$ the subset of $X$ such that $f(x)=1$ for $x\in X$, i.e. $A=\{ x\in X\mid f(x)=1$, or not? (Wondering)
Olinguito said:
No, not that way. Consider two elements of $\mathcal P(X)$, namely subsets $A$ and $B$ of $X$. Suppose $\Phi(A)=\Phi(B)$, i.e. their characteristic functions are equal, $1_A=1_B$. Can you show from this that the subsets must be equal, $A=B$? To do so, let $x\in A$ and show that $x\in B$, which will prove that $A\subseteq B$. The reverse inclusion will follow by symmetry.


I got it! (Smile)
Olinguito said:
Here’s a hint: the method used in proving surjectivity can come in handy here. It will help you find a function $\Psi:\{0,1\}^X\to\mathcal P(X)$ such that $\Psi\circ\Phi=\Phi\circ\Psi=I_{\mathcal P(X)}$ (the identity map on the power set of $X$). (Happy)


We have that $\Phi (A)=f$ then the inverse is of the form $\Psi (f)=A$, right? But how is this defined? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
We set $A$ the subset of $X$ such that $f(x)=1$ for $x\in X$, i.e. $A=\{ x\in X\mid f(x)=1$, or not? (Wondering)
$A$ should be the subset of $X$ such that for all $x\in X$, $x\in A$ if and only if $f(x)=1$. Can you see what happens next?

mathmari said:
I got it! (Smile)
Great! (Happy)
mathmari said:
We have that $\Phi (A)=f$ then the inverse is of the form $\Psi (f)=A$, right? But how is this defined? (Wondering)
Given a function $f:X\to\{0,1\}$, let $A\subseteq X$ be as defined above in the surjectivity proof, and set $\Psi(f)=A$. Now work out $\Psi\circ\Phi$ and $\Phi\circ\Psi$.
 
Olinguito said:
$A$ should be the subset of $X$ such that for all $x\in X$, $x\in A$ if and only if $f(x)=1$. Can you see what happens next?


With this $A$ we get that $1_A=f$, right? (Wondering)


Olinguito said:
Given a function $f:X\to\{0,1\}$, let $A\subseteq X$ be as defined above in the surjectivity proof, and set $\Psi(f)=A$. Now work out $\Psi\circ\Phi$ and $\Phi\circ\Psi$.


We have that $\Phi (A)=1_A$. Using the definition of $A$ as aboce we have that $\Phi (A)=f$ and then $\Psi (f)=A$ is the inverse which maps elements from $\{0,1\}^X$ to $\mathcal{P}(X)$.

Is everything correct? (Wondering)
 
That’s basically it. (Nod)

This exercise proves the following. While every characteristic function is a function from $X$ to $\{0,1\}$ (by definition), the converse is also true: every function from $X$ to $\{0,1\}$ is a characteristic fuction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K