Is $f$ a one-to-one function if $\text{Re}(f') > 0$ on a convex set $X$?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the problem of determining whether a holomorphic function \( f \) defined on a convex set \( X \subset \mathbb{C} \) is one-to-one, given that the real part of its derivative \( \text{Re}(f') > 0 \) throughout \( X \). It is established that this condition implies that \( f \) is indeed a one-to-one function. The proof relies on the properties of holomorphic functions and the implications of the open mapping theorem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of holomorphic functions
  • Knowledge of complex analysis, specifically the open mapping theorem
  • Familiarity with the concept of convex sets in the complex plane
  • Basic understanding of derivatives and their properties in complex functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the open mapping theorem in complex analysis
  • Explore the properties of holomorphic functions and their derivatives
  • Investigate the implications of the argument principle in complex analysis
  • Learn about convex sets and their significance in complex function theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of holomorphic functions and their applications in mathematical proofs.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here's this week's problem!

_______________________

Problem. Let $f$ be holomorphic function on a convex set $X \subset \Bbb C$ such that $\text{Re}(f') > 0$ on $X$. Show that $f$ is one-to-one.

_______________________

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's problem. You can find my solution below.
Since $X$ is convex, if $z_1$ and $z_2$ are distinct points of $X$, then \[\frac{f(z_2) - f(z_1)}{z_2 - z_1} = \int_{[z_1,z_2]} f'(z)\, \frac{dz}{z_2 - z_1} = \int_0^1 f'((1 - t)z_1 + tz_2)\, dt.\] Taking real parts and using the condition $\text{Re}(f') > 0$, we find that
\[\text{Re}\left(\frac{f(z_2) - f(z_1)}{z_2 - z_1}\right) > 0.\] Thus $f(z_1) \neq f(z_2)$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K