Is $f$ an isometry and $X$ compact implies $f$ is bijective and a homeomorphism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof that if a function $f: X \rightarrow X$ is an isometry, meaning it preserves distances as defined by the metric $d$, and if the metric space $X$ is compact, then $f$ must be bijective and a homeomorphism. The key properties of isometries and compactness are leveraged to establish that the continuous nature of $f$ ensures it is both injective and surjective, fulfilling the criteria for a homeomorphism.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric spaces and the definition of isometries.
  • Knowledge of compactness in topology.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of bijection and homeomorphism.
  • Basic principles of continuity in mathematical functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of isometries in metric spaces.
  • Explore the implications of compactness in topology.
  • Learn about the relationship between continuity and bijectiveness in functions.
  • Investigate examples of homeomorphisms in various metric spaces.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and anyone interested in the properties of metric spaces and their transformations will benefit from this discussion.

Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Here's this week's problem.

-----

Problem: Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. If $f:X\rightarrow X$ satisfies the condition
\[d(f(x),f(y))=d(x,y)\]
for all $x,y\in X$, then $f$ is called an isometry of $X$. Show that if $f$ is an isometry and $X$ is compact, then $f$ is bijective and hence a homeomorphism.

-----

Hint:
If $a\notin f(X)$, choose $\epsilon$ so that the $\epsilon$-neighborhood of $a$ is disjoint from $f(X)$. Set $x_1=a$, and $x_{n+1}=f(x_n)$ in general. Show that $d(x_n,x_m)\geq \epsilon$ for $n\neq m$.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's problem. You can find the solution below.

Proof: Let $a\notin f(X)$. Since $d$ is continuous, we have that it maps $X$ (which is compact) to a compact set. Thus, $X\backslash f(X)$ is open and some $\epsilon$-neighborhood of $a$ is disjoint from $f(X)$. In that case, $d(a,f(a))=l>\epsilon$. By the isometry property, $d(f(a),f(f(a)))=l$ and so on. Hence, by iterating the application of $f$ to $a$, we generate an infinite sequence of points in $f(X)$ (that is, $f(a)$, $f(f(a))$, $f(f(f(a)))$, etc). Let's call these points $a_1$, $a_2$, $a_3$, etc. Observe that $d(a_j,a_k)$ for any $j,k$ with $k>j$ will be the same as $d(a,a_{k-j})$ by the isometry property and since $d(a,a_{k-j})>\epsilon$, it follows that all of the points in the sequence $(a_i)$ are farther than $\epsilon$ from one another. Thus, we have an infinite sequence with no convergent subsequence, which contradicts the assumption of $X$ being compact. Therefore, $f$ must be surjective. It's also clear from the isometry property that $f$ is injective, hence $f$ is bijective. Furthermore, since isometry guarantees the continuity of $f^{-1}$, we have that $f$ is a homeomorphism. $\hspace{.25in}\blacksquare$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K