MHB Is g(n)=8n/15 Only When n Is Divisible by 3 and 5?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poirot1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Proof
Poirot1
Messages
243
Reaction score
0

Show that g(n)=8n/15 iff n is divisible by 3 and 5 and by no other primes, where g is the euler totient function.

How to go about the proof?




 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: totient function proof

Rewrite $N$ as a product of powers of $3$ and $5$. Use the multiplicative property, and what is the totient of a prime power?

Full derivation below.

If $N = 3^m \cdot 5^n$ then $\varphi(N) = \varphi(3^m \cdot 5^n)$. Using the multiplicative property:

$$\varphi(3^m \cdot 5^n) = \varphi(3^m) \cdot \varphi(5^n)$$
And you know that for prime $p$ we have:

$$\varphi(p^k) = p^{k - 1} \cdot (p - 1)$$
And so:

$$\varphi(3^m) \cdot \varphi(5^n) = \left ( 3^{m - 1} \cdot (3 - 1) \right ) \cdot \left ( 5^{n - 1} \cdot (5 - 1) \right ) = 8 \cdot 3^{m - 1} \cdot 5^{n - 1}$$
And...

$$3^m \cdot 5^n = N ~ ~ ~ \implies ~ ~ ~ 3^m \cdot 5^n \cdot \left ( 3^{-1} \cdot 5^{-1} \right ) = 3^{m - 1} \cdot 5^{n - 1} = N \cdot 15^{-1}$$
And we conclude:

$$\varphi(N) = 8 \cdot 3^{m - 1} \cdot 5^{n - 1} = 8 \cdot N \cdot 15^{-1} = \frac{8}{15} \cdot N$$
 
Last edited:
Re: totient function proof

first n should be divisible by 3 and 5 since phi(n) is the number of the positive integers relatively prime with n
so phi(n) is integer for all n.
suppose n is divisible by another prime p, say
n = 3^r 5^s p^t...(1)
g is multiplicative
g(n) = g(3^r)\cdot g(5^s)\cdot g(p^t)

g(n) = 3^r \left( 1 - \frac{1}{3} \right) 5^s \left(1 - \frac{1}{5} \right)g(p^t)

g(n) = 3^r \left( \frac{2}{3} \right) 5^s \left(\frac{4}{5} \right) g(p^t)

g(n) =3^r\cdot 5^s \left( \frac{8}{15} \right) g(p^t)

from (1)
3^r\cdot 5^s = \frac{n}{p^t}

g(n) = \frac{8n}{15} \frac{g(p^t)}{p^t}
we want p such that g(p^t) = p^t , that's true for 1 just
 
Poirot said:

Show that g(n)=8n/15 iff n is divisible by 3 and 5 and by no other primes, where g is the euler totient function.

How to go about the proof?


The basic formula of the Euler's Totiens Function is...

$\displaystyle \varphi (n) = n\ \prod _{p|n} (1-\frac{1}{p})$ (1)

... so that Your equation...

$\displaystyle \varphi(n)= \frac{8\ n}{15}$ (2)

... is satisfied if...

$\displaystyle \prod _{p|n} (1-\frac{1}{p}) = \frac{8}{15}$ (3)

... and that happens only for $\displaystyle n= 3 \cdot 5 = 15$ ...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top