Is Halliday/Resnick: "Fundamentals of Physics"? good for me?

  • Context: Intro Physics 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sidgupta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the suitability of Halliday/Resnick's "Fundamentals of Physics" for a high school student preparing for AP Calculus BC. Participants confirm that the book is appropriate for someone with a background in kinematics, forces, waves, electricity, and magnetism, especially if they are concurrently learning calculus. Recommendations include obtaining an older edition of Halliday/Resnick for cost-effectiveness and ensuring consistency between volumes I and II. Additionally, Randall Knight's "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" is mentioned as a viable alternative, with both texts being beneficial for understanding calculus through physics applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of high school-level physics concepts such as kinematics and electricity.
  • Familiarity with calculus topics including derivatives and rates of change.
  • Basic knowledge of vector mathematics, specifically geometric and Cartesian vectors.
  • Ability to engage with calculus-based physics texts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Purchase an older edition of Halliday/Resnick's "Fundamentals of Physics" from online retailers like Amazon or Abe Books.
  • Explore Randall Knight's "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" for a comparative study of physics texts.
  • Research supplementary resources that integrate calculus with physics applications.
  • Consider enrolling in a summer course or online class that covers calculus and introductory physics concurrently.
USEFUL FOR

High school students preparing for AP Calculus BC, educators seeking effective physics textbooks, and anyone interested in integrating calculus with physics learning.

sidgupta
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hello there!

I'm a 17 year old high school student entering grade 12 in September, and I'm looking for something to quench my thirst for physics during my summer break. I have 6 weeks of vacation at the moment, and am currently teaching myself how to do calculus with hopes of working through AP calculus BC books. I wanted a calculus-based physics book that I can read alongside with what I'm studying, so I can hopefully learn more about physics, and apply the mathematics I've learned in a practical use. I was considering Halliday/Resnick: "Fundamentals of Physics", as it is calculus based, but I'm wondering if it's right for me.
My most recent physics course was grade 11, in which we covered kinematics, forces, waves and sound, electricity and magnetism, and work and energy. As for calculus, I will be going through mostly the grade 12 material involving geometric and Cartesian vectors, derivatives, rates of change, exponential and logarithmic functions, and lines and planes, which are all at a high school level.

I was wondering, if I were to purchase this book for my own reading, would I be able to understand the concepts discussed with my current knowledge and background? If not, what other books would you recommend to suit my current situation?

Thanks so much!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: The Bill
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are learning calculus well, then yes. Get an older edition of Halliday & Resnick, since they can be had for very little from online stores such as Amazon and Abe Books. Just make sure you get the same edition for each of volumes I and II.

Also, seeing applications in the physics text can help you to understand the calculus as you are learning it. Many university students take physics I concurrently with as calculus I, seeing both treated at university level for the first time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sidgupta
The Bill said:
If you are learning calculus well, then yes. Get an older edition of Halliday & Resnick, since they can be had for very little from online stores such as Amazon and Abe Books. Just make sure you get the same edition for each of volumes I and II.

Also, seeing applications in the physics text can help you to understand the calculus as you are learning it. Many university students take physics I concurrently with as calculus I, seeing both treated at university level for the first time.

Hey! Thanks so much for the reply! I was also told that Randall Knight's "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" was also a good book for my current situation. Do you know anything about that, and what do you think of it?
 
I used RH as a undergraduate and taught from it as a graduate student throughout the 1970's. RH is hard to beat.
I recently looked at a copy of Knight that I bought. Of course I do not know as much about it as RH, but I also felt Knight was pretty good.
I do not think you can go wrong with either one. Seems like you have adequate background for either.
 
Yeah, HR book is very good in your situation, i used to study physics form there while in high school, the background that HR gived to me helped me a lot later in university :p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
750
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K