Is Hawking Radiation inherently unimportant?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Rorkster2
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
I know their is a theoretical answere to this or else the theory would have no traction...

If a black hole emits a particle at a high speed, wouldn't logic say that the black holes immense gravity simply pull it back in? Also, what kind/size particle is theorized to eject?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Rorkster2 said:
I know their is a theoretical answer to this or else the theory would have no traction...

If a black hole emits a particle at a high speed, wouldn't logic say that the black holes immense gravity simply pull it back in? Also, what kind/size particle is theorized to eject?

You completely misunderstand Hawking Radiation. I suggest you read up on it and THEN if you have questions, please ask.

The link that Chronos provided is a more recent study, but will likely just confuse you if you don't read first read about the radiation as Hawking presented it.