Is Humanity Detectable Everywhere on Earth?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Fermi Paradox and the detectability of humanity on Earth. Participants argue that despite humanity's extensive presence, detection is limited due to geographical distribution and environmental factors. For instance, vast areas of the planet are uninhabited or difficult to observe, such as oceans, deserts, and dense forests. The analogy drawn suggests that just as we can observe distant galaxies, we should consider broader observational methods on Earth to assess humanity's visibility.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Fermi Paradox
  • Familiarity with geographical distribution and environmental factors
  • Basic knowledge of observational techniques, such as using binoculars and radio receivers
  • Awareness of the limitations of traditional observation methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced observational techniques for detecting signals in remote areas
  • Explore the implications of the Fermi Paradox on extraterrestrial life detection
  • Study geographical distribution patterns of human populations
  • Investigate the use of technology in enhancing visibility over large distances
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for astronomers, environmental scientists, and anyone interested in the implications of the Fermi Paradox and the visibility of human civilization on Earth.

newjerseyrunner
Messages
1,532
Reaction score
637
I was discussing the Fermi Paradox with a coworker at lunch and he made a very good point that I hadn’t considered and I don’t really hear mentioned on the topic: distribution.

The assumption that if ET was everywhere, we should see it everywhere. The point was that that should be true for humanity on Earth as well.

We’ve for all practical purposes completely covered the planet as thoroughly as Id expect a colonizing species to cover its cosmic neighborhood.

I play Geoguesser. It is very common to be plopped down in a location where the only sign of humanity is the road the street view is on. And this is because GeoGuessr only comes from that sample on roads.

But if you truly plopped down on a random location on Earth with binoculars and maybe even a radio receiver, how likely would you be able to detect humanity? 2/3 of the time, you’d be in the ocean. Huge chunks of the planet are covered in ice, desert, forest…

We tried to Google various things and couldn’t really figure out a way to quantify it. You could probably see a mile or two on average? At high elevations it’ll be far longer, in dense jungles it’ll be essentially zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's silly (best family friendly adjective that I could come up with on short notice).

Give me a loincloth and a crystal radio and a long wire, and I can detect radio transmissions pretty much anywhere on Earth. It may take me 12 hours to do so (Quiz Question -- why?), but it's pretty much a certainty.

Well, technically I don't need the loincloth, but again, just trying to keep this PF thread family-friendly. :wink:

1654128629613.png

https://www.dga.org/Craft/DGAQ/All-Articles/1202-Spring-2012/Shot-to-Remember-The-Right-Stuff.aspx
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, Mondayman, pinball1970 and 1 other person
In drawing an analogy between the Earth and ... the galaxy, why would you limit your Earth observations to binoculars? That severely limits your observations to the horizon.

We can see through the back side of our galaxy, into the next one, on out of the local cluster, all the way to the CMBR.

If we were to analogize that to Earth, you ought to be able to see, well (pi to the e, carry the one) 12,500 miles in any direction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K