- #31
s13ep
I'm more witty, as well.Cruz Martinez said:
Is intelligence determined by popular vote?
- Thread starter s13ep
- Start date
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the concept of intelligence and whether it can be determined by popular vote. Participants explore the nature of intelligence, its relationship to personal adaptation, and the implications of voting on someone's perceived intelligence. The conversation includes elements of debate and conceptual clarification.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Some participants argue that intelligence is not a matter of popular vote but rather an adaptation of the mind.
- Others propose that voting on intelligence reduces complex arguments to simplistic judgments based on personal emotions.
- There are claims that vague or unclear posts contribute to misunderstandings, leading to a breakdown in communication.
- Some participants express that the act of voting itself does not substantiate claims of intelligence.
- Several participants engage in a back-and-forth about the validity of their arguments and the nature of intelligence, with accusations of misunderstanding and trolling.
- There are assertions that the discussion is being reduced to a single perspective, ignoring the complexity of the arguments presented.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of intelligence or the validity of voting as a measure of it. Multiple competing views remain, with ongoing disagreements about the clarity of posts and the implications of voting.
Contextual Notes
Some participants express frustration over perceived vagueness in arguments, while others challenge the notion that intelligence can be quantified through votes. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and assumptions about intelligence and communication.