Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the claim that all measurements count photons, exploring the implications of this assertion across various types of measurement devices and methods. Participants examine examples from different domains, including thermometers, balances, and sound measurements, while questioning the validity of the original claim.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest that measurements of weight or sound may not involve counting photons.
- There is a distinction made between using photons and counting photons, with some arguing that seeing the reading of a thermometer does not equate to counting photons.
- Questions are raised about the precision of measurement devices that do not count photons, with some asserting that most measuring devices do not count photons.
- Examples provided include using a tuning fork to measure piano tuning, reading braille, tasting whisky, and assessing sensitivity in a sore tooth, all of which are claimed to not involve counting photons.
- One participant mentions that while electromagnetism is involved in many measurements, it does not necessarily mean that photons are counted in those measurements.
- Concerns are expressed about the lack of a specific reference for the original claim, with calls for clarification on the source of the assertion.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express disagreement regarding the claim that all measurements count photons, with multiple competing views on the nature of measurements and the role of photons. The discussion remains unresolved as participants present differing examples and interpretations.
Contextual Notes
Some participants note that the involvement of electromagnetic interactions in measurements does not imply that photons are counted, highlighting the complexity of the topic. The discussion also reflects a need for specific references to support claims made.