MHB Is it enough to show that it is a Lebesgue measure?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure
Click For Summary
To prove that a translation invariant Borel measure $\mu$ on $\mathbb{R}$ with $\mu([0,1))=1$ is a Lebesgue measure, it is sufficient to demonstrate that $\mu([a,b))=b-a$ for all rational intervals $[a,b)$. The discussion highlights that if two Borel measures coincide on intervals of the form $[a,b)$, they will also agree on the entire $\sigma$-algebra generated by those intervals. This implies that establishing the measure's behavior on rational intervals can extend to all Borel sets. The question raised is whether this is adequate to conclude that $\mu$ is indeed a Lebesgue measure. Ultimately, the focus is on the properties of Borel measures and their implications for Lebesgue measure equivalence.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I want to show that when $\mu$ is a Borel measure in $\mathbb{R}$ with $\mu([0,1))=1$, which is a translation invariant, then it is also a Lebesgue measure.

I have shown that $\mu([a,b))=b-a, \forall a,b \in \mathbb{Q}$.

Is it enough to show that $\mu$ is a Lebesgue measure?? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If two Borel measures agree on intervals of the form $[a,b)$ then they agree on anything in the $\sigma$-algebra which is generated by those intervals.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K