MHB Is it enough to show that it is a Lebesgue measure?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I want to show that when $\mu$ is a Borel measure in $\mathbb{R}$ with $\mu([0,1))=1$, which is a translation invariant, then it is also a Lebesgue measure.

I have shown that $\mu([a,b))=b-a, \forall a,b \in \mathbb{Q}$.

Is it enough to show that $\mu$ is a Lebesgue measure?? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If two Borel measures agree on intervals of the form $[a,b)$ then they agree on anything in the $\sigma$-algebra which is generated by those intervals.
 
I posted this question on math-stackexchange but apparently I asked something stupid and I was downvoted. I still don't have an answer to my question so I hope someone in here can help me or at least explain me why I am asking something stupid. I started studying Complex Analysis and came upon the following theorem which is a direct consequence of the Cauchy-Goursat theorem: Let ##f:D\to\mathbb{C}## be an anlytic function over a simply connected region ##D##. If ##a## and ##z## are part of...
Back
Top