- #1
Pythagorean
Gold Member
- 4,400
- 312
Is it no longer required that you provide a peer-reviewed reference in the OP in skepticism and debunking?
It depends on the post, if it's just an anecdote about an experience and makes no claims, or an article about something unusual from a "mainstream" source, it's ok. If it is a "claim", or deals with non-mainstream science, forum rules requiring peer-reviewed research in a journal listed with Thompson-Reuters, etc... apply.Pythagorean said:Is it no longer required that you provide a peer-reviewed reference in the OP in skepticism and debunking?
No, providing peer-reviewed references is still a standard and important practice in scientific research. It allows for the evaluation and validation of the information presented in research studies.
A peer-reviewed reference is a source that has been evaluated by experts in the same field of study before being published. This helps to ensure the credibility and accuracy of the information presented.
Using peer-reviewed references is important because it allows for the verification of information and ensures that the research is based on reliable and accurate sources. It also helps to avoid potential biases or errors in the research.
In some cases, such as in preliminary research or when citing personal communication, peer-reviewed references may not be available. However, it is still important to provide as many credible sources as possible to support the research.
Peer-reviewed references can be accessed through various databases, online journals, and libraries. It is important to use reputable sources and check for the credibility and validity of the reference before using it in research.