MHB Is it Possible for an Absolute Value Equation to Equal a Negative Number?

AI Thread Summary
Absolute value equations cannot equal a negative number because the definition of absolute value represents distance, which is always non-negative. For example, the equation |x^2 + 4x| = -12 has no real solutions, as absolute values cannot yield negative results. Additionally, complex numbers also do not provide solutions, since their magnitudes are defined as non-negative real numbers. The absolute value function is structured to ensure that outcomes are always zero or positive, regardless of the input. Thus, there are no exceptions to this rule in either real or complex numbers.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Precalculus by David Cohen 3rd Edition
Chapter 1, Section 1.2.

Question 68, page 11.

Before typing the textbook question, I must say that I have not been able to find a satisfactory answer to absolute value equations that equal a negative number.

Question:

Explain why there are no real numbers that satisfy the equation | x^2 + 4x | = - 12.

Aside from the question above, can we say the answer is a complex number?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Precalculus by David Cohen 3rd Edition
Chapter 1, Section 1.2.

Question 68, page 11.

Before typing the textbook question, I must say that I have not been able to find a satisfactory answer to absolute value equations that equal a negative number.

Question:

Explain why there are no real numbers that satisfy the equation | x^2 + 4x | = - 12.

Aside from the question above, can we say the answer is a complex number?

Actually, there won't be any complex solutions, either. That's because, if $z$ is a complex number, its magnitude $|z|$ is defined to be the real number representing its distance from the origin. So, if $z=a+ib$, then $|z|^2=z \cdot \bar{z} = (a+ib)(a-ib)=a^2+b^2,$ which is real and non-negative. Therefore its square root, $|z|,$ will be also.

Conclusion: the result of taking the magnitude (absolute value) of any quantity, real or complex, is always a real number. Moreover, that real number is always non-negative. There are no exceptions to this rule, either in the real numbers or in the complex numbers.

Think of it this way: you want to measure the distance from one thing to another thing. So you get out your tape measure and measure the distance. Can you ever get a negative number as the result? No? Well, you can always think of any absolute value/magnitude as the distance from one thing to another, even if one of them is zero: $|x|=|x-0|=$ distance from $x$ to $0$. You can also look at the definition of the absolute value function:
$$|x|=\begin{cases}\!\!\!\!&\phantom{-}x,\quad x\ge 0 \\ \!\!\!\!&-x,\quad x<0 \end{cases}.$$
The result in either case is always non-negative.
 
What if there is a minus sign in front of the absolute value?

Let a be any real number.

- | a | = - a, right?

- | - a | = - (a) = - a, right?
 
RTCNTC said:
What if there is a minus sign in front of the absolute value?

Let a be any real number.

- | a | = - a, right?

- | - a | = - (a) = - a, right?

Almost. You can think of the minus sign as canceling: $|a|=a$. But now, whether there's a solution or not depends greatly on $a$. If $a>0$, there is one solution: $a$. The reason why $-a$ is not a solution is that you'd have to plug it in on both sides of the equation, including the RHS. But then you have a magnitude sign equal to a negative number, which can't happen. The same goes for if $a=0$, but of course there, you already know what $a$ is! If $a<0$, there is again no solution, for the reasons we've stated above.
 
Interesting ideas.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top