Is It Possible to Destroy the Sun with Just a Beam of Energy?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jones111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sun The sun
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical scenario of whether a beam of energy, specifically a highly powered laser, could destroy the sun by disrupting its gravitational binding. Participants explore the implications of energy absorption by the sun and the conditions necessary for such an event to occur, touching on concepts of gravitational binding energy and the nature of energy beams.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a sufficiently powerful beam of energy could rival the sun's gravitational binding and cause it to go nova, but acknowledges gaps in understanding gravitational binding.
  • Another participant argues that the sun's massive size and strong gravitational forces would require an immense amount of energy to disrupt it, suggesting that even nuclear explosions would not suffice.
  • A participant questions the feasibility of a beam of energy being powerful enough to affect the sun, noting that any energy or mass that large would likely collapse into a singularity.
  • Some participants emphasize the need for clarity on what is meant by "energy beam" and "disrupt gravity," expressing skepticism about the possibility of disrupting gravity itself.
  • Several participants assert that a powerful laser would likely not interact significantly with the sun, potentially passing through without causing disruption.
  • One participant expresses confusion over the terminology used by their friend, indicating a lack of understanding of the physics involved.
  • Another participant explicitly states that it is impossible to cause the sun to go supernova by shining a powerful laser at it, reinforcing the idea that the interaction would be minimal.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the feasibility of using a beam of energy to destroy the sun. While some explore the theoretical implications, others firmly reject the idea, leading to an unresolved discussion with multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding of gravitational binding and the nature of energy beams, indicating that assumptions and definitions are crucial to the discussion. There is also a recognition of the complexity involved in the interaction between mass and energy.

jones111
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello, New here, hoping to get some answers...

So here's my dilemma, me and my friend are having this debate. He claims that a beam of energy, of any size, even smaller than an ant, should be enough to destroy the sun. His theory is that, if the beam carries enough energy to rival the gravitation binding of the sun, it would just disrupt it and cause the sun to go nova.

Basically the theory entails that a beam of energy is shot at the sun, then the sun absorbs energy and then blows up, due to the excess energy absorb for its gravitation binding.

To be honest I see a lot of holes in this theory, and I don't understand gravitation binding that good. So is there any merit to this, let's say hypothetically you can generate a beam with that amount of energy. Would it work the way he planned?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well first of all , "beam of energy" that is something you tell your kids before they go to sleep , normally for adults energy comes in different forms , there are kinetic energies (when mass is moving at a certain speed) radiation energy like the wavelength of a photon or let's just say light.
Sunlight burns your skin if you stay in it for too long so it has energy you could say.

Now as for the sun part.Even exploding nuclear bombs on sun wouldn't make it go into pieces.The sun is extremely big and has a lot of mass , now as you would understand a lot of mass tends to hold together really good (strong gravity) so for you to be able to break that chunk of mass apart you would need huge and vast amounts of energy would it be kinetic of some traveling object or whatever.
Also if the explosion wouldn't be big enough the pieces of the sun would rejoin together to form the sun again as not all hydrogen is used up and when it would join together it would form a spherical object which would compress itself under it's mass and voula nuclear fusion again and we have sunshine again, so I would say almoust impossible a scenario. Even for the star wars. :D
 
I'm not very smart, but the numbers don't add up to me. A "beam" of whatever kind of energy would need to be pretty powerful. An explosion large enough to push apart 1 solar mass would be well over 3 solar masses, right? From my understanding, any form of energy or mass that large will just collapse into a singularity.

Please correct me if I'm wrong in this assumption.
 
So before anyone can really answer your question, you will have to tell us what you mean by "energy beam" and "disrupt gravity". Once we know that, perhaps we can talk about an "energy beam" "distrupting" gravity! Personally, I don't know of anything that can "disrupt gravity".
 
Crazymechanic said:
Well first of all , "beam of energy" that is something you tell your kids before they go to sleep , normally for adults energy comes in different forms , there are kinetic energies (when mass is moving at a certain speed) radiation energy like the wavelength of a photon or let's just say light.
Sunlight burns your skin if you stay in it for too long so it has energy you could say.

Now as for the sun part.Even exploding nuclear bombs on sun wouldn't make it go into pieces.The sun is extremely big and has a lot of mass , now as you would understand a lot of mass tends to hold together really good (strong gravity) so for you to be able to break that chunk of mass apart you would need huge and vast amounts of energy would it be kinetic of some traveling object or whatever.
Also if the explosion wouldn't be big enough the pieces of the sun would rejoin together to form the sun again as not all hydrogen is used up and when it would join together it would form a spherical object which would compress itself under it's mass and voula nuclear fusion again and we have sunshine again, so I would say almoust impossible a scenario. Even for the star wars. :D

By beam of laser, he basically means a highly powered laser and I have somewhat come to the same conclusion, but my friend keeps on insisting about this gravitational binding thing. Which is a topic I've never come across, been reading about it though.

Anyway thanks.
 
HallsofIvy said:
So before anyone can really answer your question, you will have to tell us what you mean by "energy beam" and "disrupt gravity". Once we know that, perhaps we can talk about an "energy beam" "distrupting" gravity! Personally, I don't know of anything that can "disrupt gravity".

Basically he's saying an ubberly high powered laser, charged with enough energy that rivals or surpasses the suns gravitational binding. He's stating that just by shooting the beam at the sun, the laser's energy would add to the suns, disrupting the gravitational binding and cause the sun to go supernova.

By the way I have told him that it doesn't make sense, since mass, the physical characteristics of both the sun and the laser and energy distribution, factors in, since it determines how two interacts. But he keeps insisting that all you need to do is have enough energy to rival the suns gravitational binding problem solved.

Another thing my friend is a hell of a lot more physics savvy than me, but I just can't agree with him on this.

And thanks for replying.
 
jones111 said:
Basically he's saying an ubberly high powered laser, charged with enough energy that rivals or surpasses the suns gravitational binding. He's stating that just by shooting the beam at the sun, the laser's energy would add to the suns, disrupting the gravitational binding and cause the sun to go supernova.

By the way I have told him that it doesn't make sense, since mass, the physical characteristics of both the sun and the laser and energy distribution, factors in, since it determines how two interacts. But he keeps insisting that all you need to do is have enough energy to rival the suns gravitational binding problem solved.

Another thing my friend is a hell of a lot more physics savvy than me, but I just can't agree with him on this.
He's not savvy on this. Nothing that humans can manufacture would have much effect on the sun.
 
jones111 said:
Basically he's saying an ubberly high powered laser, charged with enough energy that rivals or surpasses the suns gravitational binding. He's stating that just by shooting the beam at the sun, the laser's energy would add to the suns, disrupting the gravitational binding and cause the sun to go supernova.

Nonsense. It is utterly impossible to cause the Sun to go supernova by shining a super powerful laser at it. (Which is different than simply exploding it by overcoming its gravitational binding energy)

By the way I have told him that it doesn't make sense, since mass, the physical characteristics of both the sun and the laser and energy distribution, factors in, since it determines how two interacts. But he keeps insisting that all you need to do is have enough energy to rival the suns gravitational binding problem solved.

I can't possibly see it working this way. A laser powerful enough to disrupt the Sun would probably just punch right through. Especially if its a thin beam.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Drakkith said:
Nonsense. It is utterly impossible to cause the Sun to go supernova by shining a super powerful laser at it. (Which is different than simply exploding it by overcoming its gravitational binding energy)

I can't possibly see it working this way. A laser powerful enough to disrupt the Sun would probably just punch right through. Especially if its a thin beam.

I came to the same hypothesis as well. Basically there wouldn't be much interaction between the sun and the laser, at least that's what I think. I just needed the extra nudge of confirmation on this, he uses so much unfamiliar terms on us, that we just kind of let it pass, but this just doesn't make sense to me.

One other thing, how would you cause a sun to explode by overcoming its gravitation binding?

Thanks for the reply...
 
  • #10
jones111 said:
One other thing, how would you cause a sun to explode by overcoming its gravitation binding?

It's more like you would overcome the binding energy if you caused it to explode.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #11
Drakkith said:
It's more like you would overcome the binding energy if you caused it to explode.

I think my understanding of "gravitational binding energy" has gone up a notch, thanks by the way.

So correct me if I''m wrong, but basically you need to overcome the gravitational force(gravitational binding energy) that's holding the sun together. With a force greater than and maybe bigger than it. Let's say an explosion, or hit it with a ubber giant planet/asteroid if such even exist.

As of now I think he has a child's understanding of energy. Mainly because of the word energy at the end of "gravitational binding energy" he may have thought you can just add up or subtract energy without considering the physical structure or type of energy the object or projectile consist of. (He watches a lot of anime, so I think he got that there).
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Yeah, energy is a very specific thing in science. Quite simply, it is the ability to perform work. That's it. It's not some mystical substance that can be blasted around.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K