Is it possible to express cos(40) as a radical?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter neilparker62
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radical
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 3K views
TL;DR
Trying to find an expression for cos(40 degrees) (using any combination of radicals)
What sort of number is cos(40) ? You can solve the equation:

$$ 4 \cos^{3}40 -3\cos40+0,5=0 $$

but you end up with complex numbers requiring a cube root. The polar angle gets divided by 3 and you end up needing cos(20) or cos(10) in your answer. No way (it seems) to express as a radical or combination of radicals in any form .

The solution from WA is interesting. There are 3 solutions - as a 'bonus' for solving for cos(40), you also get answers for cos(20) and cos(80).

1629984571091.png
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Mathematics news on Phys.org
cos(40) is the real part of z where z^9 is 1.
You can factor the polynomial Z^9 - 1. to get (z^6+z^3+1) (z^3-1) (see cyclotomic polynomial).
(z^6+z^3+1) is easy to solve, and will get you (cos(40)+sin(40)i) and (cos(80)+sin(80)i)
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: neilparker62
willem2 said:
cos(40) is the real part of z where z^9 is 1.
You can factor the polynomial Z^9 - 1. to get (z^6+z^3+1) (z^3-1) (see cyclotomic polynomial).
(z^6+z^3+1) is easy to solve, and will get you (cos(40)+sin(40)i) and (cos(80)+sin(80)i)
I was hoping to find an expression for cos(40) in terms of radicals but it seems that won't be possible. I did find a wiki page on which angles could be expressed that way. Multiples of 10 don't seem to be on the list.
 
neilparker62 said:
I was hoping to find an expression for cos(40) in terms of radicals but it seems that won't be possible. I did find a wiki page on which angles could be expressed that way. Multiples of 10 don't seem to be on the list.
There are some multiples of 10° on the list, why do you think this is?
Degrees were invented by humans
## 180° \equiv \pi ##
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: neilparker62