Is it possible to obtain excess energy from a Townsend discharge?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of obtaining excess energy from a Townsend discharge, focusing on the mechanisms of gas ionization and the potential for energy transformation within this context. The scope includes theoretical exploration and speculative reasoning regarding the energy dynamics in electrical discharges.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Speculative
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that a continuous flow of gas can be ionized in a Townsend discharge, questioning if the avalanche of secondary electrons could yield more electric energy than the energy input to the electric field.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the energy stored in gas, noting that gas typically does not store energy in a usable format for this purpose.
  • A different participant clarifies that the energy referred to is related to free electrons produced from gas ionization and suggests that optimizing discharge conditions could potentially reduce the high ionization energy required.
  • This participant speculates that by transitioning from surface to volume discharge and optimizing electrode surface texture, it may be possible to increase the number of free electrons generated, potentially leading to more electrical energy than supplied.
  • One participant acknowledges their unfamiliarity with the topic and invites others to contribute.
  • Another participant notes that speculation is not permitted on the forum, leading to the closure of the thread.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of obtaining excess energy from a Townsend discharge, with some skepticism regarding the energy storage in gas and the speculative nature of the proposals. The discussion remains unresolved, particularly regarding the potential for energy surplus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes speculative elements and lacks consensus on the mechanisms and feasibility of energy extraction from Townsend discharges. There are also concerns about the speculative nature of the claims made.

environes
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Let us assume a continuous flow of gas that can be ionized between the electrodes where an electric discharge is generated. According to the principle of conservation of energy, energy cannot be created or destroyed, but it can be transformed from one form to another with losses, e.g. in the form of heat.

Is it possible to have a configuration in which the avalanche of secondary electrons in a Towsnend discharge provides electric energy due to the effect of electron emission at an electrode that is bombarded by the avalanche of electrons and the electric energy received is greater than the energy put into the electric field accelerating the electrons? The energy surplus would, of course, come from the energy stored in gas.

Thank you in advance for your explanation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm unfamiliar with Townsend discharge. Can I ask what energy is stored in the gas that is available for use by the device? Gas typically doesn't store energy in a format that can be used in this manner, as ionizing the gas requires a substantial input of energy in the first place.
 
When talking about obtaining surplus energy from the energy stored in the gas, I mean the products of gas ionization, mainly free electrons. I am aware that gas ionization requires a significant energy input. However, I would like to expand on the point of view customarily taken on the issue of Townsend's discharge and therefore my post is speculative.

The problem of high ionization energy could be reduced by optimizing the discharge initiation environment, e.g. by switching from surface to volume discharge. In this transition, the Townsend discharge condition with an avalanche of electrons will be maintained.

Let me explain: the ionization energy of a gas is usually given per mole of that gas. Therefore, if we choose such conditions that the initiation of the discharge will take place with the smallest amount of gas possible (one way is, as I have already mentioned, the transition between different types of discharges, the other may be, for example, texturization of the electrode surface, where the irregularities will ensure a smaller contact surface of the electrode with the gas in surface discharge.

Maintaining the Townsend discharge condition, the current in the gas will increase rapidly. So if we go from a relatively small volume of ionized gas to a larger one, we will receive free electrons in an amount exceeding the original electrons. And here's my question: could the final amount of electrons provide more electrical energy than that supplied to maintain the electric field?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, I see what you're saying now. Unfortunately I don't know the answer, as this is not something I'm very familiar with. Perhaps someone else here on PF can assist you. Best of luck to you.
 
environes said:
therefore my post is speculative.
Sorry, we do not allow speculation at PF. Thread is closed.
 
@environes please stand by while berkeman and I discuss this.
@berkeman see the report I've assigned to you.
 
@environes I've sent you a private message so that we can clarify what's being discussed here and make sure that it falls within the bounds of PF rules. Please respond when you can. Until then the thread will remain locked.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K