Is it possible to obtain excess energy from a Townsend discharge?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of obtaining excess energy from a Townsend discharge through the avalanche effect of secondary electrons. Participants explore the concept of energy transformation in ionized gas, emphasizing that while gas does not store energy in a usable format, free electrons generated during ionization could theoretically yield more electrical energy than the energy input. The conversation highlights the importance of optimizing discharge conditions, such as transitioning from surface to volume discharge and texturizing electrode surfaces to enhance electron production. Ultimately, the thread was closed due to speculation and the need for clarification on the topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Townsend discharge principles
  • Knowledge of gas ionization processes
  • Familiarity with electron avalanche phenomena
  • Basic concepts of energy transformation and conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods to optimize Townsend discharge conditions
  • Explore the effects of surface texturization on electrode performance
  • Study the principles of gas ionization energy and its implications
  • Investigate the role of free electrons in electrical energy generation
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and researchers interested in plasma physics, energy transformation, and advanced discharge technologies.

environes
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Let us assume a continuous flow of gas that can be ionized between the electrodes where an electric discharge is generated. According to the principle of conservation of energy, energy cannot be created or destroyed, but it can be transformed from one form to another with losses, e.g. in the form of heat.

Is it possible to have a configuration in which the avalanche of secondary electrons in a Towsnend discharge provides electric energy due to the effect of electron emission at an electrode that is bombarded by the avalanche of electrons and the electric energy received is greater than the energy put into the electric field accelerating the electrons? The energy surplus would, of course, come from the energy stored in gas.

Thank you in advance for your explanation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm unfamiliar with Townsend discharge. Can I ask what energy is stored in the gas that is available for use by the device? Gas typically doesn't store energy in a format that can be used in this manner, as ionizing the gas requires a substantial input of energy in the first place.
 
When talking about obtaining surplus energy from the energy stored in the gas, I mean the products of gas ionization, mainly free electrons. I am aware that gas ionization requires a significant energy input. However, I would like to expand on the point of view customarily taken on the issue of Townsend's discharge and therefore my post is speculative.

The problem of high ionization energy could be reduced by optimizing the discharge initiation environment, e.g. by switching from surface to volume discharge. In this transition, the Townsend discharge condition with an avalanche of electrons will be maintained.

Let me explain: the ionization energy of a gas is usually given per mole of that gas. Therefore, if we choose such conditions that the initiation of the discharge will take place with the smallest amount of gas possible (one way is, as I have already mentioned, the transition between different types of discharges, the other may be, for example, texturization of the electrode surface, where the irregularities will ensure a smaller contact surface of the electrode with the gas in surface discharge.

Maintaining the Townsend discharge condition, the current in the gas will increase rapidly. So if we go from a relatively small volume of ionized gas to a larger one, we will receive free electrons in an amount exceeding the original electrons. And here's my question: could the final amount of electrons provide more electrical energy than that supplied to maintain the electric field?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, I see what you're saying now. Unfortunately I don't know the answer, as this is not something I'm very familiar with. Perhaps someone else here on PF can assist you. Best of luck to you.
 
environes said:
therefore my post is speculative.
Sorry, we do not allow speculation at PF. Thread is closed.
 
@environes please stand by while berkeman and I discuss this.
@berkeman see the report I've assigned to you.
 
@environes I've sent you a private message so that we can clarify what's being discussed here and make sure that it falls within the bounds of PF rules. Please respond when you can. Until then the thread will remain locked.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K