MHB Is it possible to prove the inequality without using induction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the inequality $\dfrac{1}{2} \cdot \dfrac{3}{4} \cdot \dfrac{5}{6} \cdots \dfrac{1997}{1998} >\dfrac{1}{1999}$ without using induction. Participants express admiration for the elegant solution provided by a user named Ackbach. The challenge lies in finding a non-inductive approach to demonstrate the inequality's validity. The conversation highlights the complexity of the problem and the satisfaction of discovering a solution. Overall, the thread showcases a successful mathematical exploration of inequalities.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Show that $\dfrac{1}{2} \cdot \dfrac{3}{4} \cdot \dfrac{5}{6} \cdots \dfrac{1997}{1998} >\dfrac{1}{1999}$, where the use of induction method is not allowed.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is equivalent to showing
$$1 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot \dots \cdot 1999 > 2 \cdot 4 \cdot 6 \cdot \dots \cdot 1998.$$
But this is so, since $3>2$, and $5>4$, etc. The left-hand product has one more term (the number $1$) in it than the right-hand term. Therefore, the left-hand product is greater.
 
Wow...the moment I saw this problem, I naturally perceived as a hard to prove sort of inequality problem but you cracked it in such an elegant method! Well done, Ackbach, and thanks for participating! :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top