MHB Is it possible to prove the inequality without using induction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the inequality $\dfrac{1}{2} \cdot \dfrac{3}{4} \cdot \dfrac{5}{6} \cdots \dfrac{1997}{1998} >\dfrac{1}{1999}$ without using induction. Participants express admiration for the elegant solution provided by a user named Ackbach. The challenge lies in finding a non-inductive approach to demonstrate the inequality's validity. The conversation highlights the complexity of the problem and the satisfaction of discovering a solution. Overall, the thread showcases a successful mathematical exploration of inequalities.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Show that $\dfrac{1}{2} \cdot \dfrac{3}{4} \cdot \dfrac{5}{6} \cdots \dfrac{1997}{1998} >\dfrac{1}{1999}$, where the use of induction method is not allowed.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is equivalent to showing
$$1 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot \dots \cdot 1999 > 2 \cdot 4 \cdot 6 \cdot \dots \cdot 1998.$$
But this is so, since $3>2$, and $5>4$, etc. The left-hand product has one more term (the number $1$) in it than the right-hand term. Therefore, the left-hand product is greater.
 
Wow...the moment I saw this problem, I naturally perceived as a hard to prove sort of inequality problem but you cracked it in such an elegant method! Well done, Ackbach, and thanks for participating! :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top