Is learning epsilon-delta proofs before analysis a good idea

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Magenta55
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Idea Proofs
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Learning epsilon-delta proofs is not essential for understanding limits in calculus, especially for beginners. While the text by Stewart provides a foundational understanding of differential calculus, it lacks rigor compared to Michael Spivak's "Calculus," which emphasizes mathematical theory and proofs. It is advisable to focus on mastering the foundational topics such as Differential Calculus, Integral Calculus, Vector Calculus, and Linear Algebra before delving into analysis. Supplementing calculus studies with rigorous texts can enhance comprehension but should not interfere with mastering basic concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Differential Calculus (derivative rules, word problems)
  • Integral Calculus (Riemann Integrals, Fundamental Theorem of Calculus)
  • Vector Calculus (dot/cross product, equations of planes)
  • Linear Algebra (vector spaces, eigenvalues, eigenvectors)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Michael Spivak's "Calculus" for a rigorous understanding of calculus concepts
  • Explore the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus in detail
  • Learn about Riemann Integrals and their applications
  • Investigate the principles of Linear Algebra, focusing on eigenvalues and eigenspaces
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those pursuing higher-level calculus and analysis, as well as educators seeking to enhance their teaching methods in foundational mathematics.

Magenta55
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello PF people. It's my first post here, but I have been lurking around this forum for awhile now.

I'm currently learning differential calculus using a text by Stewart and I want to attain a better comprehension of pure mathematics.

My question is: would it be a good idea to get another text to supplement Stewart and gain a deeper understanding of how limits work using the epsilon-delta definitions at this stage of my education? or would this be a waste of time (meaning, is it better to finish integral calculus and vector calculus, then start analysis)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd say there's no harm in learning it along with your work, provided it doesn't interfere with the basics of what you're learning now. I started reading Spivak to supplement my calculus knowledge while I was in Calc II.
 
Stewart isn't a terribly rigorous introduction to calculus; if you want something more mathematically pure and rigorous, Michael Spivak's ``Calculus" is a favorite in the math community for its emphasis on theory and proofs.

Learning ##\delta - \epsilon## proofs isn't crucial to understanding limits (especially if you're just getting into calculus yourself). I would say just get comfortable with what I would call the ``foundation" of higher math. This includes:
-Differential Calculus (derivative rules, word problems, etc.)
-Integral Calculus (right/left sums, Riemann Integrals, FTC I and II, solids of revolution, etc.)
-Vector Calculus (dot/cross product, equations of planes, parametrizing curves in space, curl, flux, divergence, Stokes, Green, Jacobians, etc.)
-Diff Eq. (Laplace transforms, physics problems, etc.)
-Linear Algebra (Vector spaces, bases, inverses, ranks, determinants, eigenvalues, eigenvectors, eigenspaces, etc.)
-[Maybe a proofs class somewhere in here?]

So try to bone up on the topics above (i.e., get really comfortable with it). If your aim is to pursue higher math, I wouldn't recommend skipping any steps or you might risk overwhelming yourself with too much theory without having seen many applications and how the material is related. So, there's no harm in exposing yourself to some analysis now, although it's probably more practical to wait until you have all your bases covered.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K