Is Math an Invention or a Natural Phenomenon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sonicelectron
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores whether mathematics is an invention of humans or a natural phenomenon. Participants examine definitions of "invention," the relationship between mathematical concepts and nature, and the implications of viewing mathematics as a tool versus a discovery.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants define "invented" as something created by humans based on principles existing in nature, suggesting that counting is a human invention.
  • Others argue that all knowledge, including mathematics, is a human creation, with structures built from axioms that may or may not reflect nature.
  • A participant mentions that changing foundational axioms can lead to the discovery of new mathematical structures, prompting deeper inquiry into the nature of mathematics.
  • Some express skepticism about categorizing math strictly as invented or discovered, suggesting that such distinctions can be semantic and unhelpful.
  • There are references to historical figures like Euclid and Galileo, with discussions about how their views relate to the invention versus discovery debate.
  • One participant highlights the evolutionary basis for basic mathematical concepts, suggesting that some mathematical abilities may have developed through natural selection.
  • Another participant questions the relevance of emotions in the context of mathematics, indicating a divide in how participants relate feelings to mathematical concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether mathematics is an invention or a natural phenomenon. Multiple competing views are presented, with some leaning towards invention and others towards discovery, while some challenge the usefulness of the distinction altogether.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying definitions of key terms like "invention" and "discovery," and there are unresolved questions about the implications of these definitions on the understanding of mathematics.

  • #121
Here's my 2 cents on the subject.

Is math invented or discovered? Let's get to the root of the question and make it even more basic.

Is the concept of prime numbers discovered or invented?

A mathematician -- a good mathematician -- might make the claim that the set of prime numbers is invented. This in turn might bring about a typical reaction from a person less well versed in mathematics,

Typical reaction to prime numbers being invented:
You got to be kiddin' me. Invented? That's about the most arrogant statement I can imagine. Do you honestly think that if we ever made contact with another species of intelligent life, with advanced technology, that they wouldn't have a concept of prime numbers? And if they did, which they assuredly would, what would you do? Throw your hands up and yell, "Thieves! Thieves! Prime numbers are man-made! The Zorgon empire stole them from us! Prime numbers were invented by humans so the Zorgon empire is just a bunch of thieves! Just like those damn, thieving cicadas! Thieves!"​

But that's not what the mathematician means by inventing prime numbers. As a matter of fact, most mathematicians actually like cicadas. More to the point, the invention of prime numbers is very different than inventing a novel recipe for a tuna sandwich on rye bread with some mayonnaise.

The mathematician is purposefully being inconclusive -- agnostic if you will -- on the subject of whether prime numbers are a crucial, fundamental part of our universe. Rather the mathematician is saying that prime numbers were at least invented by humans. If in the future we make contact with the Zorgon empire, and they also happen to have a concept of prime numbers, the mathematician would say the set of prime numbers was independently invented by both humans and Zorgons. The mathematician may very well suspect that prime numbers are in fact a fundamental part of our universe -- but he just cannot prove it. And I don't mean that we just haven't found a proof yet, but rather it seems as though the concept may not even by provable. The good mathematician, not wanting to make claims of what has not been proven, or make conjectures to what is unprovable, stays quiet on the subject.

The set of prime numbers fall out from our created axioms, such as Peano axioms which go without saying that they are obviously invented.

Then, the real crux of the issue comes from Gödel's incompleteness theorems, which when applied here, means that we can't prove anything outside our axioms. We cannot definitively prove that another technologically advanced, intelligent species would have made the same axioms.

I fully expect that if you were to take that mathematician -- or any good mathematician -- aside in private and ask him or her,

Question: If we were to encounter another form of intelligent life, of considerable technological advancement, do you think they would have a concept of prime numbers? The same set of prime numbers that we have?
Answer: Well, yeah. Of course. I mean I would really be surprised if they didn't! Well, the notation would obviously be different. Any they might include the number '1' in the set (we do not anymore). But the rest of them sure. Can you imagine! A technologically advanced society without prime numbers! That's not going to happen. So yeah, I'm pretty sure they would. But I cannot prove it.​

And similarly, although I cannot prove it, I fully suspect that with the Zorgon empire's own equivalents to Gödel's incompleteness theorems, if the zorgons were confronted with the same question, they would throw their arms up in the air and run around chanting "Qz! Qz!" where the word "qz" from the zorgon native tongue is translated as:

qz
/ kwǝz /

interjection

The affirmation that the set of prime numbers was invented by the ancient zorgonians and was independently invented by the despicable kladies of the planet Kladbor, as well as being independently invented by a species of the planet Earth know as cicadas. The term continues the affirmation that there is also another, very tasty species of Earth beings called humans that claim to have independently invented the set of prime numbers as well, but it is equally likely that the delicious humans stole the idea from the cicadas. The term has a connotation that it is welcomed and encouraged to sit down during tea and discuss the origin of prime numbers with humans over rye bread and some mayonnaise.
noun

A sandwich consisting of humans, rye bread and mayonnaise. Sometimes served with a light spread of cicada sauce.





 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #122
Here's an insightful clip about what Stephen Wolfram thinks:

 
  • #123
Very interesting video, Phion. He doesn't exactly say our math is invented, but that it is one of many possible mathematics, an "artifact" of the particular route taken by human history.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
377
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
10K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K