Is Metaphysics the Future of Art and Science?

  • Thread starter Thread starter oldtobor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Art Metaphysics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion posits that the future of inquiry will pivot from science to philosophy, particularly metaphysics and art, as all scientific problems are resolved. It asserts that philosophy transcends science by questioning fundamental assumptions and logic, leading to a realm where arbitrary constructs can be invented. The dialogue emphasizes that philosophy does not aim to enhance understanding but rather to explore aesthetic and artistic expressions. Ultimately, it concludes that as science evolves to manipulate neural networks, the boundaries between art and science will dissolve, resulting in a new form of creative expression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metaphysical concepts in philosophy
  • Familiarity with the relationship between art and science
  • Knowledge of neural networks and their implications
  • Basic principles of logic and reasoning
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of neural network manipulation on human cognition
  • Research the intersection of art and science in contemporary philosophy
  • Investigate the role of aesthetics in philosophical discourse
  • Study the evolution of metaphysical thought in relation to scientific advancements
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, artists, cognitive scientists, and anyone interested in the convergence of art and science in the context of metaphysical inquiry.

oldtobor
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
The only thing that will be left to study in the future is philosophy. It is science that will end. Once all our practical scientific-technical problems have been solved, and we can manipulate all matter and ourselves infinitely, then only philosophy-metaphysics-art will be left, and that study will last forever.
This study will lead to inventing any arbitrary science and art form as knowledge. Any sequence of signs and pictures can become an invented irrational mathematics-physics.

Trying to understand metaphysical problems in philosophy always ends up questioning more fundamental assumptions as it proceeds. Why "understand" more or less ? Why use any form of logic ? What exactly are we trying to reach ? These ideas go on forever and as you proceed you slowly disassemble all thought processes, logic, reason, all intentions and you end up with everything and/or nothing. The end result is mostly aesthetic or artistic. Just invent arbitrarily anything etc.

Philosophy has no given goal. It doesn't necessarily want to increase our understanding, some philosophers may want to decrease our understanding as "understanding" may not be such an interesting goal. Some philosophy likes the purely artistic view of things hence there is no relationship with science. Some philosophy likes to be completely wrong on everything because they are not using right and wrong concepts or non contradictions as taken for granted.

Philosophy, in the wider sense, is very much more general and abstract than science, it questions every conceivable assumption, demolishes every conceivable logic and thought process. Real philosophy is truly non social and has no use whatsoever. It is this that makes it so much grander than science.

One could say why search for the "truth" ? Why not search for the best lies, non-truths or try to get as far away as possible from the truth ? After all, searching for the truth is one of the assumptions we take for granted. Why not invent better and better lies ? why not contradict ourselves more and more ? Why is truth assigned a higher "value" than that which is "false" ?

Let's play a game of demolishing all possible assumptions:

1) why ask why ? so my philosophy doesn't ask why anymore it just assigns arbitrary false facts...

2) why execute any thought ? So my philosophy doesn't contain any thought anymore

So I can say the mind is a car tire and it's thoughts are a light bulb in your house. You can assign anything, any idea, concept; it becomes more and more an aesthetical - artistical construction. You can even go full circle and watch TV as that is the maximum philosophical achievment.

We are talking about science as an expired process. After which only pure invention will reign. There are no constraints, anything can go. What is the square root of multiplication ? An invented symbol as an infinite number of others to create a purely invented science. So any image can be a language and can associate to any meaning-operation much like art. Even the most fundamental logic of dividing things up as separate or as one can be manipulated. 2 apples can be grouped as one and further grouped with the table on which they lay and this can be considered one unique object and manipulated with any kind of invention.

When science will have reached the point of manipulating our own neural networks, this will become apparent since then we will invent our own mind, emotional systems, thought structures etc. Art and science will become one and the same. Imagine a modified mind where all the information paths can be changed and all the associated emotional structures can be manipulated in billions of combinations, the space-time references can be changed, enhanced, new sense organs can be mixed and created since all the information in our minds is only electrical signals.

So then we would be using science to produce Art in the form of modified brains. But all we will ever perceive is extracted properties from objects. It is how you extract a given value or what given value you choose that makes an object perceivable, so science itself is always a pure invention. If you decide to measure the mass of a particle compared to another, you already simply invented a number since that given choice of property compared to another reference is a pure invention. We decide that that measurement is significant and important whereas objectively speaking, for the physical universe, there is no difference between that choice and any other such as the distance between 2 rocks on mars.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Even the assumption of knowing or not knowing can be manipulated. Why know more or less ? if we had a direct manipulation of our neural circuits we could change the "knowledge configuration" and create any kind of combination including all kinds of false and invented knowledge. Or we can mix knowledge/memories of a mind with the state of knowledge it had at 15 years old with pieces of knowledge it may have at 50.

Then atoms don't exist, they are only pictures, and physics itself can be invented at all levels. Are there invariants ? Who cares, we can assign all.
Art and science would become one and both aesthetical objects completely manipulatable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
575
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K